This article contains Large spoilers For "I know what you did last summer" 2025.

In 1997 "I know what you did last summer", along with The series of movies (and TV show) followed, generally considered weaker. More specifically, it is a weakness of Whodunit, the type that brings the tradition of mysteries to murder, known by Agatha Christie, as much as they rejoice in the scenes of the scenes. This type of weaker tends to tone the supernatural element as seen in something like "Halloween" by Johnon Carpenter, which contains Many mysterious activities Including his masked killer that cannot be easily explained or rationalized. This tone for "Iquids" was established in much of the 1973 Lois Duncan novel by the same name, but the screenwriter "Ikidles", Kevin Williamson, has reworked the mystery of murder in more truth, much for Duncan Chagrin.

Because of this reputation for the series to be founded in reality, the Fans of the Franchise "Ikwydls" generally rejected the second sequel to the direct-video-video "I will always know what you did last summer", turning the fisherman's image into the ghost demon. To be fair, the sequel to the first two films is kept vague, as it turns the story of the Jameseii (Ennennifer Lion Hewitt) and her friends into a kind of urban legend that now has the power to literally haunt people who are doing the crime of oil. Should the supernal fisher (Don Shanks) be the spirit of Ben Willis (Muse Watson) or his son, Will (Matthew settled), or just a figure of ghosts all?

With the announcement of the sequel to heritage this month, Also, titled "I know what you did last summer", These special questions are now powerless, as the director/co-writer Ennenifer Katin Robinson and co-writer Sam have returned the action to Southwort, North Carolina, with a fisherman again. However, Robinson does not combine all aspects of the supernatural. Instead, she accepts and recognizes the long -standing use of a series of supernatural elements in a big way with the surprising return of the late Helen Shivers (Sarah Michel Gellar) into an unnecessarily frightening night scene.

Most fans reject "Friday on the 13th part VI: Asoneyson lives"-a fishing fisherman in "I will always always know", but it would be wrong to claim that "Ikids" had not previously contained elements of the supernatural. Latent supernatural elements in the series come directly from the basic premise of the original story, which is that a group of teenagers (or young in general) are considered accidentally responsible for the death of a stranger, an incident that they then decide to cover up and keep a secret for various reasons. When the mysterious notes begin to be delivered to the group a year later, claiming that the anonymous sender knows what they did last summer, it is true that the films quickly jump on the characters trying to play a drying detective who could know their secret. However, the notion of the person who accidentally killed him somehow get a certain karmic revenge for their murder, hanging over the characters and movies themselves, borrowing all that supernatural.

Or, if it is not in itself supernatural, then this element at least introduces urban legend, which movies use further. In the first film, Ben Willis can pull an extremely complex series of traumatic Banks and Jelen and others. After all, how was the blue-collar fisherman able to fill a carcass truck and live cancer and then remove them all for a few minutes? In "I still know ..." Like Robinson's film, the extra benefit of there Two killers of fishermen Helps with the account of these close ones, but there is still tight dignity for some of their feats. Of course, this trophy may be part of the DNA of the weak film to this point, but it is still considered the addition of the scarf vibration. In this context, the inclusion of a supernatural killer in "I will always know ...", and the introduction of a cult in the 2021 series is not so transplanted because they are extrapolations of this tone. It is a tone that not only exists in every slimmer film, but one that of course becomes an element in polasine franchises, if for no better reason than the idea of similar events that are often repeated to have some credibility.

Although "I know what you did last summer" 2025 is planted firmly in the series "Whodunit Thriller Thriller Roots, it contains what is probably the most pronounced scene in the series beyond" I will always know ... "the most important supernatural element in the first two films are actually such for retroactive reasons. Their endings, which secured a final attack on a "chair jumper" by the potentially unpleasant fisherman against Jululey, were played as realistic initially, only for them to be withdrawn from their subsequent sequels as nightmare. In Robinson's film, Danica (Madeleine Wedge) has a vision during a nightmare, which is explicitly presented as such.

In her, the late Helen, a woman that Danica only recently heard, appears on the young girl as a by -product of her traumatic wines for the murder of her fiancé, Wyatt (Oshoshua Orpin). Of course, Gellar's return would be pointless if she didn't get a moment to shine, so Danica didn't just see Helen hovering over Wyatt's hull - she's targeting a woman who seems to be supernaturally aware of being died, as well as a meter in Danica.

Robinson is not ashamed of making the sequence of an adventurous nightmare. Not only do the lighting and stading of the sequence explicitly supernatural, Helen begins to bleed from her head And it turns to Danica's eyes into a living carcass. This choice may or may not be a celebrity of a fisherman -like zombie from "I will always know ..." Whether or not, the moment relies hard in the latent supernatural themes of the series, as it is a scene that can be easily at home in Gothic horror film or even Extension "Nightmare on Elm Street". Although great for the actress and her character's fans, Robinson guarantees that the nightmare sequence is not just an excuse to return Gellar and Helen. Instead, the moment helps "ikwydls" to retain that extra dimension of eerie, allowing the film to feel more obedient than being an ordinary festival or hacker-and red festival.

The whole point of Duncan's original story was the characters who haunt the traumatic wines of their actions, even though the films make it haunting a little more explicitly than implicitly, the inclusion of that element is still appropriate, intriguing, frightening and to fun.