Superman is here. The continuous performance of the film's film will be crucial in determining how success is, but so far, things are looking for. If Superman continues to increase as the weekend openedThen this work on the DC universe can actually work!

But the complication of that premise has always been Batman. Matt Reeves's "Batman" was a critical success (reading/film only) And I got a solid gross brutom ($ 772 million), so you don't just want to throw it away. But Reeves' intention to trilogy at Batman starring Robert Pattinson, with the creative freedom to make the films he loves, precedes the DC study by Jamesesheims Gun and Peter Safran. You can't have a DC universe without Batman!

So far, the line was that Reeves' epic crime saga goes forward, but as a side jobCornoded from DCU. Reeves and co-writer Metson Tomlin recently completed their scenario for the "Batman" sequel, It is reportedly "thrilled by the Warner Bros. Script". Meanwhile, one of the first projects of the DCC was released by Gun and Safran was Another movie in Batman, "The Brave and the Bold", directed by Andy Mushietti. But after Superman, I'm convinced more than ever, they need to cut the knot and have only one on the Batman screen: Robert Pattinson.

I get why not everyone is diminished for this. "Batman" is so great because it is a complete, almost uncompromising vision. The film stands on its own, is more involved in exploring Batman's inner world than to build a "common universe" around it. Putting the placement under the larger DC umbrella risks diluting it; The DCC is likely to benefit from the inclusion of Pattinson-Magman more than the other way around.

If I am sitting on the Jamesei Gun seat, however, it sounds much safer to use people in Batman than to try and have two separate actors in Batman at the same time. The fans are He is now crying for Superman of David Corenvet to meet Batman at Pattinson. In this rare case, I think the best move is to give people what they want.

The main reason why many say that Batman and Superman should not cross is that films could not be farther tonal. "Superman" is a cheerful cozy crowd filled with Great Soft Silver Age Science-Fantastics from Pocket Universes to Kaiju to evil clones and much more. "Batman" is a dark and gloomy mystery for serial killers with Batman who gets stuck in Nirvana.

Superman also determines that Metahmanpi have been around for a long time in the DC UniverseSince Batman follows in the semi-realism shown by Christopher Nolan's "dark knight". Reeves' cook has taken off the whole fantasy and seems to be in a world where Batman is the only masked Crimea.

But the whole Item At the Superman Batman meeting is how much they and their worlds are contrary to each other. Superman smiles, Batman frown. Superman dresses in bright colors, Batman continues to dark. Both are in the end of idealistic men, but Superman relies on the hope of it, while Batman is very "confidence, but confirms". Superman is a stranger like a God -fearing man who chooses to be human, and Batman is a normal man who is imposed by the impossible. In Metropolis, the sun never seems to be going on, and in the city of Gotham, it never seems to grow.

One of the reasons that Zac Snyder's "Batman Against Superman" fell flat in that movie, there was There is no contrast between the two heroes. Both Batman (Ben Affleck) and Superman (Henry Caville) were stoic, quiet and bloody, and so similar to being foils. Since Superman of Corenswet Aw-Shucks is a light year away from the withdrawn, Grunga Batman, who creates Grungi, who creates more opportunities to play with each other.

Unlike the tone homogeneity of the Marvel film universe, Gunn said (In an interview with IGN) DCU films will work like DC Comics, IE, different tones depending on what artists do. The different niches of the DC universe do not always feel like they need to fit together, because the great heroes were created by different people, not originally intended for congeale. Batman highlights the best of everything. Batman who goes to dark, violent adventures like "Cult" by Jimim Starin and Bernie Rightson is the same Batman that appears every week to help justice league to fight the colorful strangers.

But I'm hard to think this is a bad something. Allow the directors to tell the best possible stories and do not limit them to uniform aesthetics; Gun's attitude makes it look like Reeves wouldn't be Complete Rejecting creative freedom if they convey his Batman. There is also the fact that Canon in DCC is Already loose. Explain the characters from the extended universe of Gun, Canon, Suicide Squad and the "Peace Lovers", explained Gun (In the 2023 announcement of threads):

"Some actors will play the characters they have played in other stories and some plot points may be in line with the conspiracy points of the dozens of films, shows and animated projects that come from DC in the past."

I say, apply this Pattinson principle; Use it as a Batman of the CCU, no matter how unclear to maintain continuity. To make someone else play Batman at the same time when Pattinson is set by that new actor for failure. Pattinson also has enough range as an actor That he can be any kind of Batman Gun what he wants ... So use it.

Superman plays in theaters. The Batman sequel is currently scheduled for the release on October 1, 2027.