NBA star Anthony Edwards'Ex Ayesha Howard He has accused him of the court fighting for his only custody to be taken into custody, Our weekly Can report exclusively.
On June 27, Howard Minnesota filed a declaration against the Timbervolovs star as part of his case, Aubri claimed that in some parts, Edwards's legal steps had "financial loss".
Last year, Edwards, a scheduled DNA test, was the father of Baby Girl, born on October 2024. Howard filed a Edwards In California for paternity and child assistance. The NBA has files the star Ay Sequel In Georgia.
Edwards did not think that Howard had actually moved to California and said he believed that he had filed in Los Angeles in the hope of receiving a higher child support award. Howard denied his claim and said he had moved to LA a few months before their daughter was born.
In court documents, Edwards made it clear that he was not looking for custody or looking at his daughter. He said that the only thing that needs to be determined is the support.

Earlier this year, the judge, who was chaired by Howard's case in LA, had determined that child assistance in Georgia should be determined. However, he said the order of custody in LA could be possiblely established
At a hearing on May 7, the teams go behind the issue. At one point Ayesha asked the judge, "She is not looking for inspection or custody, why even why - why - my child is there. It doesn't like, 'Oh I have to come to see him in California."

Edwards's lawyer argued for the establishment of custody in Georgia. He said, "Because now, today, (Edwards) is not requesting custody. I don't know what happens in the next 18 years."
After Howard said The court, "As far as child support goes, I mean, as far as the child is in custody, Anthony doesn't want to do anything to my child. He revealed it. He showed it. I haven't seen him.
At his recent pace, Howard claimed that a few days after the hearing, Edwards and his team agreed to give their daughter's only physical and legal custody.

He attached the proposed verdict, it was alleged that the Edwards team was sent by the team, which gave him the only custody. This proposal also has the provision to forbid each party to talk about social media or others in public.
Howard said he asked that Edwards's lawyer removed some provisions from the deal, but they were pulling their legs.
At this pace, he accused Edward's party violating the court's order and being involved in "the strategy of delay in bad faith", which has "damaged unnecessary financial".
Specifically, he said that they refused to submit the proposed verdict to give his only custody. He said that the Georgia court will not judge the child's support until the custody verdict is given.
Howard said that his daughter was "inconsistent for the extended time by his father."
Edwards has not yet responded.
Source link