We can get a procurement commission made from links.

The horror film by William Peter Bliti in 1990 "Exorcist III" was based on his own novel in 1983 "Legia", following his hit novel in 1971 "Exorcist". Although both books were shown the usual characters (Kindderman's police detective is a protagonist, and he talks to the supposed dead father Damjan Karas), it is a different kind of story, performed more as a combined police procedural, dark serial killer thriller (based on a very closer murder). Blati wrote and directed the film adaptation in 1990, thinking that it would also be tangently linked to the "exorcist" and will have a similar approach to bending the genre.

"Exorcist III" was not a big hit in 1990, but over the years it has suffered a significant re -assessment, and some cinemas now consider it to be Almost good as well as William Friedkin's film adaptation in 1973 to the "Exorcist". Kindderman is starring in George F. film. Scott (replacing Cob from Friedkin's film), and the sequel really manages to be a police procedure in combination with a supernatural mystery. Also, there are some very powerful, disturbing pictures (including an infamous jump jump) and air -conditioning with a semi -Serbian conversation that connects spirituality, demons and divine. It is complex, heavy, ambitious and overall quite well.

Like his novel, Blititi hoped his 1990 film would be called "Legion" and would not have the world "Exorcian" in his title. Early tears for the movie They suggest that Bliti was initially able to reach a compromise with supporters of the film's studio because they refer to the film as "Exorcist III: Legion". Blati, you see, he wanted his film to stand alone, but he also wanted to distance himself from the truly terrible and catastrophic and catastrophic sequel to Johnon Borman, "Exorcist II: Hetka". Unfortunately, the directors behind the film eventually insisted that the word "exorcist" appears in the title and that true exorcism is involved in the film.

Bretti was convinced that "Exorcist III" relied on box office, simply because he was called "Exorcist III". He felt that he could tell an interesting story and attract a huge audience without reminding them of Borman's critical and commercial flop. Bretti also didn't want to have a real exorcism in the film or tell a story without exorcists. While the film was produced, the 20th -century studio Fox and colleague producer Morgan Creek shot around various titles, including "Exorcist: Legion" and "Exorcist: 1990", but Blati continued to insist that it was a bad idea.

Blati's protest for this note is recorded in Bob McCabe's biography in 2000 "Exorcist: Out of Shadows". As he said:

"I begged them when they were thinking of headlines not to name him"Exorcist ' Everything - because 'Exorcist II ' was a disaster over the imagination. You can't call it 'Exorcist III'Because people will avoid the cashier. But they went and named him 'Exorcist III. Then they called me after the third week, when we started to fade to the box office, and they said, "" is you the reason: it will hurt, you won't like this - the reason is "the reason is."Exorcist II. " I couldn't believe it! They had total amnesia for my warnings! "

Morgan Creek also insisted that Blity includes exorcism in the film (an element that was not present in his original book). Bretti protested against it, but ended in any case. In the end, Asoneyson Miller was hired to return like Damian Caras for this unnecessary sequence, which added an additional $ 4 million to the film's budget. However, Miller was not capable of acting because of extreme alcoholism, so Brad Even even played the character during the rest of the film (with all his scenes filmed by the fact).

Despite all the notes and changes in the studio, "Exorcist III" proved wellAnd horror fans around the world loved their ambition. Blati's ideas emerged, after all, and while its original vision for the film may have proved better, the version we received was not bad.