A judge gave the verdict Justin Now can get text messages in between Blake Lively And Taylor Swift - however related to their films only, It ends with usThe

"There may be a speed or request, and in this case it was often both attempted to exercise legitimate litigation strategies and extensive courts of people's opinions," Judge Luis Liman Wrote Wednesday, June 18, was seen by the judgment Our weeklyThe

The 35 -year -old Swift was removed by the Baldoni team to remove the subpoenas, which was finally withdrawn. (A formula near the subject is mentioned Ours Summons for Swift were excluded for "voluntarily provided information to Baldoni's legal team.)

Vijay, 37, then made a request ”Defensive order"Against Baldoni's party with their" continued claim "to contact Swift earlier this month, claiming that the messages were" irrelevant "in this case.

Judge Liman, however, did not agree to his judgment on Wednesday, "Given this lively That has represented Swift There was knowledge about the film's working environment or discussion about the film's work environment, among other issues, requests for messages related to film, and this verb was properly created to discover the information that would prove or deny the demand for lively harassment and revenge. "

A spokesperson of the livestock responded to this judgment in a statement OursHe wrote, "The court has clearly denied the proposal to force the motion of the Weefer's parties to force the documents from Mrs. Livley, who has combined with the Wafer's parties. The judgment of the court's defensive order depends on the admission of the Weefers, which they had received from the Tyler Swift, which they had received from Tailor Swift.

The statement also said, "As the rest, the teams of Justin Baldoni and Wafer demanded access to Taylor Swift's private communications - though have already been subpoured and then the subpoena has been withdrawn. Melissa Nathan He has been included in their 'scene plan' document (lively revised complaint, exhibition D), he has been referred to as bullies and calls for the strategy to influence the 'TS fanbase' (lively revised complaint, 214 (b)). We will continue to call Baldoni's relentless efforts to exploit the popularity of MS Swift, which he and Weefer's teams were facing from one day to the allegations of serious sexual harassment and revenge. "

Our weekly Reached Swift squad to comment.

Baldoni's legal battle Began on December 2024 When the actress accused her of It ends with us Coaster and sexual harassment director, creating a hostile work environment in the film set and orchestrate an alleged smirry promotion against it.

Baldni denied the allegations and gave her husband, lively, counter, counter, Ryan RenoldsAnd preaching Leslie sloin For $ 400 million, they complained of civic extortion, defamation and many others, which they denied.

Baldoni's case against Lively, Renolds and Sloen was dismissed earlier this month, but the judge allowed Baldoni and his legal party to correct their demands to violate the agreement involved in the agreement. They were given a deadline on June 23.

Baldoni Attorney Brian Friedman says, "The predictable announcement of Mrs. Lively and her team's victory is false, so let's be clear about the latest judgment." Ours In a statement June 5th.

Lively, already, Judgment On June 8, he wrote through his Instagram story, "I stood with 19 companies to protect women's rights to protect them. Like many others, I felt the pain of a revenge case with the shame that tried to break us."