Blake Lively Don't be able to access the Wefer's investigation documents in the ongoing legal battle against him JustinThe
Court documents received Our weekly Monday, June 12, the judge Lewis Jean Denying the speed viewing of lively Wafer The papers conducted by Baldoni carried out an internal investigation into Lively's complaint. Baldoni (1) and Weefer opposed Lively's speed.
The judge ruled that documents under "Attorney-Client Communication or Attorney work product" are secured. However, Wafer and Baldoni are unable to use any protected information on their defense.
"Wafer's Justin Baldoni and its on-set behavior were legally compulsory to investigate the anxiety raised by Blake Lively and others Heath Until May 2023, “Lively's lawyer Esra Hudson And Mike Gotlib One statement said in a statement OursThe "In other claims, Mrs. Lively sued, especially for failure to conduct this national investigation - is an independent cause of action under California law and the sixth reason for her revised complaint."
Blake Lively Wafer's studio condemns his lawyers "uninterrupted Chararad" for his sexual harassment claims against him, which ends with our customer and director Justin Baldoni. Livelie's legal team has filed a proposal to force Baldoni's film studio to share the "so -called 'investigative" documents around the actress's primary (…)
The statement continues: "Today, the court has ruled that Waferer does not need to create 'investigation' documents, though it has mistakenly sued Mrs. Lively for $ 1 million since recently - but it failed to launch any investigation to climb as a legal defense."
Ours Reached Baldoni to comment.
Lively, 37, and Baldoni's legal backwards began in December 2024. The actress accused her ex It ends with us Coaster and sexual harassment director, creating a hostile work environment in the film set and orchestrate an alleged smirry promotion against it.
Baldni has denied the allegations and Vibrant counterHer husband Ryan Renolds And preaching Leslie sloin For $ 400 million. The actor complained of their citizen extortion, defamation and more. The party denied the allegations.
Baldoni's case was against Lively, Renolds and Slowan before this month DismissalThe Went on to live on the lively social media Address his legal victoryThe
"Last week, I stood in pride in addition to 19 companies to protect women's rights to speak for their protection," he wrote through his Instagram story on June 9th. "Like many others, I felt the pain of a revengeful case of a revengeful case with the shame that I tried to break us."
When the case was dismissed, the judge had given permission to Baldney and his legal group Correct their claims For the inherent agreement with the agreement and the violation of the abstract intervention. They were given a deadline on June 23.
"Mrs. Lively and her team's assumption of victory is false, so let's become clear about the latest judgment,“ Baldoni's attorney Brian Friedman Stated Ours In a statement on June 5th. "When the court dismisses the claims related to defamation, the court invites us to make four amendments against Mrs. Livley, which will show extra evidence and refined complaints. This case is not about false accusations of sexual harassment and revenge because they are not" formal ".
Source link