Samuel L. Acksexone is the most successful actor of all time measured pure in terms of the amount of money brought in his films at the box office. From his continued work like Nick Hurry in Marvel's film universe In Chinese classics like Pulp Fiction, the audience has appeared to see how it has been doing its thing on the big screen for decades. Unfortunately, his last Chinese forum did not arrive with the level of fanfare he is used to.

Directed by Richard Gray, the attractions on the Recent Trinity road opened at the box office at the weekend, though someone would be forgiven that he didn't notice. Mutual only $ 559,610 On 771 screens, making a clear terrible average of $ 725 on a screen. For context, "How to Train Your Dragon" brought $ 83.7 million to $ 4,356 For an average of $ 19,214 on the screen. While no one expected this Western to work with DreamWorks, the end result leaves much to want all the involved.

Mailed against the background of the 1870s Montana, the "Trinity" gathered with Isaac Broadway (Tim Deli), a man who is on the verge of being executed when he asks his alienate son, Henry (Brandon Lesard), to kill the individual who frames him. Unable to refuse it, Henry then travels to the city of Trinity, where winds are struggling to struggle between city sheriff Gabriel Dov (Pierce Brosnan) and a mysterious figure known as St. Christopher (Acksex). David Arquette ("Crick" and Q'orianka Kilcher ("New World") also Starvar.

So how's the big star star like Acksexon and the former Jamesesheims Bond managed to create such a little interest in his open weekend? There are several factors in the game, but the biggest of all is that virtually no one has heard of this film. (Not virtually no one, of course, but in terms of the larger cinema world, it can be nobody.)

I say this as someone who writes about living movies and whose job is, in fact, to know everything about what is being shown in cinemas: I haven't heard of the "reckless Trinity" until I look at the results of the box office last weekend. It's never a good sign. What do we hope that the average movie film, which only pays attention to these things passively, would be aware of the existence of this film (let alone take care of it to get off the couch and pay to go to see it)?

For one thing, Since the pandemic he closed theaters five years agoPerforming audiences to watch movies is harder than ever, especially original films. Consciousness should be very high to have any chances of success. The consciousness was obviously very small, in this case. Also, it certainly does not help that the "reckless trinity" met with bad examinations and is currently sitting at 17% of Rotten tomatoes. What a little consciousness there didn't seem to be too positive.

Attractions by the way, for what is worth, it seems that banknotes are banknotes of these films that make most of their business out of theaters. Think when you get rid of Pamela Anderson's "Last Show" that killed her on Julu After earning less than $ 5 million domestic despite a fair amount of press and recognition. What chance did this movie have for comparison? Similarly, "Daughier King's Daughier" Daushterter, "The Daughier King's Daughier" Daugher Journal " In 2023, relying on streaming to justify its existence down.

This is, obviously, embedded in the business model for attractions by the way to some extent. However, it is difficult to imagine that everyone involved is thrilled by the results such as these. However, this speaks of Thomas about the current movie landscape. It is difficult to get people to watch movies in cinemas, but people still watch many movies at home, which can offer a second life on a reasonable budget original. We see if this one has found his audience after making his debut in the coming months.

The "negligent Trinity" is now in cinemas.