"How to Train Your Dragon" live remake by director Dean Debloyis finally flying this week, with the inevitable discourse of critics and audiences also expressing their opinions. A common consensus is that, in the middle of the current trend of adjusting the animated classics into live action, the new Universal download for the 2010 film's desired film could be the best of bad, but that it still feels quite unnecessary. Aside from several deviations of character, the initial steps for hiccups and no teeth in this inevitable three -pictures trip are almost identical to those of the spread franchise.

Let me foretell this saying I love the original films "How to train your dragon" and I believe they are one of the biggest trilogies ever made. The hearty and exciting story of Hikap's journey is associated and eventually splitting ways with the legendary night anger will always have a special place to compete with several other films.

But just as Hawks faces disbelief and anger on the idea that dragons are simply misunderstood, routine rejections to this new iteration arise: that the remake of another movie is unnecessary and that creating a live version of the animated classic. I don't have to argue against those points, but I wonder if those views are worth more. By immortalizing the same arguments, we do nothing more than frustration, rather than examining why these films are made in the first place.

The retelling story inevitably leads to a change at some point. However, the volume of those changes depends on the storyteller. The locations can be transferred, and the characters may take unexpected turns, but the basic plot remains intact. Having this in mind, how much does it need to change for the retelling to be worthy of the existing one? Undoubtedly, it is not much different from both versions of "How to Train Your Dragon", but has unblocked fulfilled its role by successfully retelling the original story? If your answer to this is: "You should not be remedied in the first place", the same argument cannot be applied to any other remake of what happened before?

We cannot mock "How to Train Your Dragon" and then go wild Guillermo del Toro's first look at Frankenstein. who will join over 100 adaptations that approached Mary Shelley's classic story in one way or another. The other main parts of the literature and theater could fall under the same umbrella, with everything from Sherlock Holmes to Shakespeare to be adapted several times by the dawn of the moving image. In that case, should Franco Zefireli's "Romeo and Juluiyet", who remains faithful to the era in which the story is set, be criticized for playing it safely and marked against Baz Lurman's gun packing? However, perhaps, the argument with "how to train your dragon" is less about replicating the recording, and more about the fact that it can prevent another art form struggling for survival.

The regular edition that "how to train your dragon" and Disney's face face is that every entrance is considered another animation blow, inadvertently reduces the very desired art form. However, the truth is that it is just as our fault as the studio.

There was a brief glow of hope that film movements really voted with their wallets after Bombed live with Disney action "Snow White". This was soon followed by news from Hollywood reporter That plans for live adaptation "intertwined" were put on hold, probably in response to that accident. But then "Lilo and Stitch" arrived, dominating the boxing office And quickly earned a place as one of the most successful films of the year. This proved that the audience does not have to be tired of listening to the same story in different form; They are just selective they want to hear.

This sad truth is that it is difficult to determine how the original animated records that are not related to the existing IP can compete in the market made up of safe, comfortable viewing. Is not for lack of attempt; We are just too far away in our request for what is now felt like your own sub-genre. Live Remains are money producers just like sequels, foretells or comic book film records (which can be claimed in some cases are also reminisces). The only danger is that the latest accessory has so much that it can benefit from more original works in the future.

2025 "How to Train Your Dragon" now has the lowest score of the franchise Rotten tomatoesAlthough it is still respectable 77%. While this can confirm today, the projected cashier for its opening is certainly not. According to reports, without teeth and friends exceed expectations, with the new film earning $ 84 million in his open weekend (via The deadline). It is a success story that some may not want to admit, but it is deserved by Dragon drivers who carry the story to life.

Whether you like it or not, Mason Thames and Niko Parker deliver praise as "Hypop" and "Astrid" and need to receive greater recognition for that. These are types of projects that can advance both Starszs' further in the careers they deserve. By now appearing in a big IP, you can guarantee that you will see them in original stories (for which critics of these film types complain of seeing no more) later. The question is that the lightweight creators of money like this should exist between it to happen.

After all, giving up the argument against this Chinese trend is not easy, and it is even more problematic because there are no signs of it or its imperfections that go anywhere. "How to train your dragon" is a remake in every sense of the word, and whether it remains true to the original or moves away from it, and many others will continue to dominate. The only way to fight it is by voting with your own dollar. What else is new?