Blake Lively Is requesting a “protective order” against JustinLegal party with their "continued claims" to contact them Taylor Swift, Our weekly Can confirm.
Lively, 37, submitted a letter to the judge Lewis Jean Friday, June 13, and seen by OursClaim that Baldoni's Weefer's teams "followed" its contacts with 35 -year -old Swift, when they publicly claimed that the documents were taken as part of them they refused to reveal An agreement to withdraw their subpoenas"From Swift and his advice.
As a result, the lively judge asked the legal party of Baldoni to stop demanding his exchange of examples, complaining that it has become a "strategy" for the Wafer parties since August 2021, to make the singer and his fan base against the vibrant "their media strategy."
Lively argued in the letter that Swift's contacts towards Waferra's teams who were dismissed earlier this month are "not central" and "irrelevant" for its own claim.
The Gossip girl Friday Alam alleged that Baldoni's team was simply requesting Swift As a "media strategy, suit -not mocking strategy." This actress "respectfully requested that he can get rid of the reactionary document production to the requests related to Baldoni's team, according to the filing.
Our weekly Reached Baldoni to comment.
Meanwhile a source near Baldoni has claimed Ours Friday that "Blake Taylor is the alleged workplace environment, revenge and damages himself ... hurts himself by his own words in red carpet and film -filled interviews."
Viva Ours In a statement on Friday, "Justin Baldoni and Wafer's teams are still demanding access to private communications on Taylor Swift - though they are already sub -paned and then withdrew that subpoena 'after receiving everything they need.' As reflecting today's filing, the crisis led by Melissa Nathan included the 'View of the Scene' Document (VI

The statement continues: "The ongoing efforts to try and use the world's largest star in this regard in this regard reflect the public reflection of the epic ratio - and only justin Baldoni's case Mess Lively, Ryan Reynolds, their campaign, and the New York Times, and the New York Times."
Lively's letter is his and the latest exchange BaldoniWhich began in December 2021. At that time, Lively filed a case against him It ends with us Caster and Director, Baldoni accused of sexual harassmentCreating a hostile work environment in the movie and orchestrate an alleged Smile campaign against him.
Baldani has filed by denial of allegations CounterSut of a 400 million dollar Against the lively, her husband, Ryan RenoldsAnd preaching Leslie sloinThe
He claimed that the threesome citizen participated in extortion, defamation and guilty of privacy false light attacks and many more. Victimal, Renolds, 48, and Sloen all have denied the allegations. Vijay and Renolds filed later The case will be dismissed And have been requested to remove sloin.
In May, the news broke that Baldoni sub -paneds the Swift, who was Year -oldWith their play heated, the trial of the initial case has increased closer. (Lively and Baldoni will go to court in the spring of 2026.)
"Taylor Swift Never set foot in the set of this movie, He was not involved in any ing or creative decisions, he did not score the picture, he never saw the editing or made any notes in the picture, " Swift's representative said Ours In a statement At that time “he didn't even see It ends with us A few weeks after public publication, and during the 2023 and 2024 periods, the world was traveling around the world under the title of the largest tour of history. "
The representative explained that Swift's "connection" with the movie "simply" was allowed to use a song, "My Tears Recochet."

After that month, Ours Sure that would be Swift No longer be subponedThe The matter said a source close Ours The summary that "because the information was voluntarily provided" was "excluded to the Baldoni team".
"We are satisfied that the teams of Justin Baldni and Weefer have withdrawn their harassment subconscious to Taylor Swift and its law company," Lively said in a statement on May 22nd. "We have supported Taylor's team's efforts to dispel this inappropriate sub -Pennas for this suggestion and we have supported the third one" and we will continue the third one.
The statement continues: “Baldney and Wafer's team are TAKE TRYER TRYING TO TEAKA woman who has been inspired by millions of people around the world at the center of the case from the very first day. Melissa Nathan's scene plan was to exploit Taylor Swift's celebrity and it continued today. They are folded in the federal court to justify themselves. At one point they will be out of conflict from the true claims of sexual harassment and revenge. "
Lively and Renolds got another legal win in early this month A judge dismissed Baldoni's $ 400 million suit June 9th. Baldoni New York TimesHe who first reported Lively's claim against him, was also dismissed.
"Mrs. Lively and her team's assumption of victory is false, so let's become clear about the latest judgment,“ Baldoni's attorney Brian Friedman Stated Ours In a statement on June 10The "Although the court rejected the demands of defamation, the court invited us to make four amendments against Mrs. Livley, which would show extra evidence and refined allegations. This case is not about the false accusations of sexual harassment and revenge and not a smart propaganda, which is not their own.
Friedman added: "Most importantly, Mrs. Lively's own claims are not true today than yesterday, and with the truth on our behalf, when we started this war and wait for her upcoming statement, which I am grateful for the public and for the persuasive."
Lively, already, Reveal his own statement After legal victory. "Last week, I stood in pride in addition to 19 companies to protect women's rights to speak for their protection," he wrote through his Instagram story on June 9th. "Like many others, I felt the pain of a revengeful case of a revengeful case with the shame that I tried to break us."
"Although the case against me was defeated, there is no fight for the fight," he said. "I am more determined to stand in favor of each woman's rights to protect myself with their protection, their integrity, their dignity and their story"
Source link