25 years ago, Johnon Travolta starred in one of the worst movies ever made

UN Travolta is a legend in many ways than one. Veteran "Saturday evening Fever" starred in several unspeakable classics, but he can also learn a master class about choosing disasters in his career. The man has been in the industry now for almost half a century and has not learned once how to make a bad decision. Since the mid-1970s, when he played a supporting role in "Kerry", Travolta appeared in projects that won his recognition, but he appeared in much more that they gained ridicule-to-degree that extent that extent Travolta now has a full seven films with direct 0% spoiled tomato results.

How does it do? Well, the expression "Passion Project" seems to be the harbinger of the Pulp Fiction starfish. Travolta, at different points, entered the head that because he liked something, it would make a fantastic movie (with him in the lead role, of course). My personal favorite example is "Goth" in 2018, a "passion project" that Travolta tried to make it seven years before his debut. Johnon Gothi's biopctic seemed to set fire to Travolta, who promoted the hell of the film constantly, joining social media for the first time so far in order to sing his praise. According to the insiders who talked Hollywood reporterThe actor really believed in his performance because the Don Mafia would succeed in unbreakable awards. Instead, Gothi stands as one of the biggest mistakes in his filmography and one of the seven 0 percent of RT.

But "Gothi" was not the first time Travolta had seen a passion project rising in his face. As I said, the man just never seemed to learn certain lessons, even after the accident that was "Battlefield Earth" in 2000. This previous "Travolta Passion Project" has become such a failure of the country that destroys Even screenwriter "Battlefield Earth" apologized for the film After the fact.

Battlefield Earth was a bad adaptation of the book L. Ron Hubbard

As films like "Trade Color" and "Life on the line" were not enough for the name of Suli Johnon Travolta, he is both a Scientologist - and quite enthusiastic. At one point, Travolta decided that he had to pay tribute to the founder of this family small cult, L. Ron Hubbard, and did so by adapting his novel in 1982 "Battlefield Earth". The Chief of Scientology Honcho was also a prolific science-fiction writer (if you can believe it), and his book about mankind rebels against the breed of tyrant foreigners known as psychos, apparently reinforced Travolta, to the extent that he basically forced him through an adaptation.

Now, we have already found that, for all his successes, Johnon Travolta had some really discharges in his career. Somehow, he even managed to lead a sequel to "Saturday night Treska" - one of the most famous films in the 70s - it was so bad that the Boston Globe Agent Globe called it "shame". In that case, however, Director Sylvester Stallone took over much of the blame for the production of such a flop. Truth be told, however, you can choose a pretty much decade and find a stink of Travolta. So, to say "Battlefield Earth" is one of his worst films, is to say that it is one of the worst movies in Hollywood history.

The film is made on a $ 73 million Budget and directed by Roger Christian, a man respected for shaping the aesthetics of science-fiction films since he helped create the light for "Starwells War: Episode IV-New Hope" and made the look of the space horror Classic. However, "Battlefield Earth" remains one of the most disastrous films for science fiction ever made.

Not that you need more explanation out of the film to be a serious ode to the man who gave worldwide Scientology from the Goth's Theve. However, if you are wondering what went wrong, here is a short explanator.

Tron Travolta really believed in Battlefield Earth

Even in pre-production, almost all, but Johnon Travolta thought that "Battlefield Earth" was a bad idea. However, the actor was eager to do so, so much that he not only invested his own money in the project, but also forced the film produced by the then newly created company by the name of franchise pictures. The head of the company, Eli Samaha, was particularly strong. The book "Visions for Apocalypse: Spectacles of Destruction in American Cinema" Quotes Samaha says, "I would say to everyone," this is a science-fiction film starring Johnon Travolta! 'Again and again.'

What they did was not good. Director Roger Christian once said Vice That Travolta sold it to the film, referring to how "Pulp Fantasy" for the Year 3000 "and" Schindler's list of science fiction ". He also claims that the actor watched the movie" As a "Starwell War," only better. " In reality, Battlefield Earth was a $ 73 million disaster, and his $ 29.7 million Global box office download was the least catastrophic thing. The film saw Travolta starring Terl, the leader of Psycholos, who ruled the country in 3000. The planet itself became a distorted hell, and Jononi "Goodboy" by Barry Pepper Tyler had enough. Hence, he leads mankind in battle against psychos to bring the planet back. Also, the Forest Whitaker is there. Add it all, and you have a movie that has left critics a little more than unimpressed.

Far from convincing the film was "Like" "War of the Starvers", just better ", Roger Ebert compared the experience of watching the film to" Traveling by a bus with someone who needed a bath for a long time "and claims that the film is not" just bad "but" unpleasant in a hostile way ". The host is quite a very tenor of views in general, with Elvis Mitchell of the Newoufor Times summarizing: "After about 20 minutes of this amateur image, extinction does not look like a bad idea."

Surprisingly, despite the horrible reviews and the fact Travolta never recovered after this treasurer"Battlefield Earth" is not one of the films with 0%of 0% Rotten tomatoes. Not that the page in which you would believe There are only two perfect military movies It should be taken too seriously, but if you are interested, Battlefield Earth has a 3% rating and a 2% rating among top critics. That means only one of the 44 top critics liked the film and that critic was Bob Graham of the San Francisco Chronicle, whose "fresh" review was: "Is it worth seeing once?" Of course. "



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *