During the weekend of the day of memory, the weekend, Lilo and Stitch earned nearly $ 150 millionDespite being A perfect average movie (Although the one with a suspiciously offensive plot is changed from the original). At the holiday, she had the fourth biggest gross rug on Monday, sometimes, surpassing films like "Spider-Man: No Made Home" and "Avengers: Endgame". Not surprisingly because a) it's a movie that benefits being a recognizable IP that causes a generation Loveube, b) stitch So Cute and on the market that He at the international level of Mickey Mouse in popularityand c) there was zero competition in the infertile media landscape for a younger audience. The cartoon network is depreciatedMr. Reining is everything, but he has died completely, the party of all ages is processed to mean "four quadrant blockbusters", and the consequence is that children's entertainment is now in a state of cultural malnutrition.

Ad

Of course, there are valuable streaming options, but the one -time collection to go to the cinema is sometimes more economical for family than continuous monthly streaming service. This means that for parents who want to nurture a Love Cinema and to instill passion to go to the movies with their little ones, the options for real children's films are limited. As a result, when there is A friendly family -friendly movie available for viewing in theaters, parents and children are riding, movies make a funny amount of money in the box office, and the studio (mostly Disney, if we are honest here) are stimulated to continue the cycle.

Of course, cultural enrichment beyond the multiplex work - museums, libraries, zoos, parks, etc. - But weapons of weapons deprivation, as some people are currently suggesting as a way to punish Disney in making more original films, is ethically bankrupt, because it requires children to bear the consequences of capitalism failures and creatively conservative conservative cowards. Expecting parents to boycott the only available family film, it feels less like a protest and more as a form of penal abstinence that punishes children for the failures of the deliberate, structural traps set by the industry. "Vote with your dollar" only works when there is another option.

Ad

In capitalist society (which we are forced to withstand), healthy competitive market forces study, streamers and networks to achieve a quality standard to attract clients over their competitors. However, when the market is monopolized and there is no direct competition, there is no motivation for the studio to maintain a high quality standard. Before Lilo and Stitch Hit Theaters, theater films for a young audience released in 2025 were Dogman, who hit theaters in January, Snow White in March, "Minecraft" in early April, and "Eye Legend" in mid -April (last -hander).

Ad

But to be honest: the question is not that children spend media that are not intellectually challenging - we All We used our fair share in rubbish programming as children - but that today's young people are fed homogenized, uninspired media with several varied, significant stories to neutralize the fall. Children are one of the most marginalized and vulnerable groups of society, and the general sense of contempt for children is both explicit and systematic, which is reflected in the disinfection of the entertainment industry to prioritize the innovative integrity of the children's media and lack of protection of the American legal system.

The 1990 Children's Television Act predicted that there would be a protected place in the "Basic Programming" broadcast of about 30 minutes for the media "specifically designed to serve the educational and information needs of children from 16 years and under, including intellectual/cognitive/emotional needs." This call inspired the creation of shows such as the Magic School and "Bill her scientific", but even then, many broadcasting networks fought as hell against demands. The regulations were processed in 1996, when the FCC ordered all commercial television stations to broadcast at least three hours of basic educational programming weekly, regularly scheduled between 7:00 am and 10:00 am, but in 2019, the FCC under the Trump administration decided to decide to "Provide more flexibility" With that regulation to accommodate the popularity of streaming services, with the fact that not everyone can afford more - even one - streaming service with access to the media for children's education. In an era before streaming, a cash with cash can allegedly afford a one-time payment on TV set and antenna, and will subsequently get air broadcasting from the largest networks for free. The analogue signals were officially cut off in 2009, as the world switched to digital.

Ad

Assuming that streaming was a mortal cell on television broadcasting, the standard of responsibility for broadcasters occurred ... and then the Kovid-19 pandemic happened, and a whole generation of formative years of children were surrounded by screens with a lesser condition for responsibility for making quality media.

While the MPA assessment system is imperfect at best and totally useless at worstThe number of films released with G-Law (for general audience) is almost non-existent. In 1968, 181 films were released with Mrs, but in 2024, just Five The movies ran into Mr.Both of them were documentaries. (Ok what then was g rating is wildly different from what we have today Thanks to the arrival of PG-3.)

Ad

The overwhelming majority of films for young audiences are given a pg rating, and the Average parent has no problem bringing their children "KUNG FU" as a movie like ". PG-rated Movie, but the pg rating has come the new standard for "Kiddie Movies" while Four-Quadrant blockbusters overwhelmingly target the pg-13 audiences. This means we are all, but it angers the concept of film or "family" film. Even an exception like "Wicked: First part", which received a PG rating, does not fit the mold because it can boast two hours and a 40-minute duration-just too long for most little ones to sit.

Parents are stuck between a rock and a hard place; Studios are not sending their best in terms of Children's Entertainment because they do have to, and the standards for programming on tv are oboming non-existent-so much so that when the FCCGUED TOLL BACK THE RESTRics. Of the Children's Television Act in 2019 for Commercial Broadcasters, they specifically identified PBS as a primary source of educational television to justify erosion. However in 2025, Trump administration Mesa Budget for PBSciting concerns about "awakened propaganda". (Fortunately, Netflix helps Sesame Street.)

Ad

The villains in this situation "Lilo and Point" are not the parents who are trying to bring joy to their children, they are executive with profit, risk study and legislative comforts that completely abdicate their cultural responsibility to provide quality content for children. It is no surprise that two of the most popular and favorite figures of children's programming, Ms Rachel and Blue, are both programs produced outside the corporate entertainment machine. Parents' accusation of "cycle reinforcement" is convenient and puts it to individual consumers instead of focusing on the exact purpose: a media ecosystem designed to give waste, knowing that the audience will celebrate because otherwise we will starve.