We can get a procurement commission made from links.

The films "Final Destination" are perhaps the most effective horror communicators in the history of the genre. They are performed as shakes, but there is no faster. The idea is that death itself, invisible force, has for film heroes and will use any physical objects around them - soap, cars, glass crashes, screws, nail pistols, bathtubs, you name it - turn them off on a whim. The "Final" films of "Flix Challenge" to invent new and innovative ways for people to die, and most of the films have scenarios for Byzantine Ruby Goldberg, with a loose screw can lead to two women being baked alive in tan beds.

Ad

The formula is durable And it is re -used for all films "Final Destination" to this day: One character has a mental prediction of a mass accident that will forcibly kill about a dozen people. The warning of foresight will immediately spread the word, allowing all potential victims to escape death. It seems that death had a plan, and it is now angry that she has broken it. Death will now subtly manipulate the universe to ensure that those people who had to die in a cataclysm. No one will come out alive. Movies all start with living people and end up with dead. There are no pretensions for the "final destination" films. Filmmakers know that we are just here to see people cat, and they no longer need an excuse. This is "Look at people to be covered by: The series".

Ad

Of course, not all "final destinations" are created equal. They rise and fall based on the quality of their killings, and not all are creative or smart in that respect. Long -term producer of franchise Craig Perry was quoted in The forthcoming book of Clark Collis "Boiling and Counting: The Resurrection and the Unrelegest Growth of Contemporary Horror Film". And he acknowledged that the fourth entry into the series, simply called the "final destination" (2009), is the worst manually.

For those who do not remember, the "final destination" was the one that began with a disaster on a professional race track. The title implies that it was supposed to be the last film in the series, although two films were made (the latest film, "Final Destination: Blood Lines", open on 16.05.2025). Was published in 2009, when Hollywood was still trying, indeed, Really It is difficult to make 3D in a widespread trend and "ultimate destination", directed by David R. Ellis was shot with 3D cameras.

Ad

The "Final Destination" was the most expensive film in the series to date, cost $ 40 million to make; The previous three films cost only between $ 23 and $ 26 million. However, it was the most successful, with over $ 186 million in the world treasurer (compared to $ 90 to $ 118 million in the top three). It is likely that the fans went to the "final destination" because he promised to be a final. These figures can also be reinforced by more expensive 3D tickets. They had fans of film exploitation films.

Craig Perry admitted that it's not good. Indeed, by 2009, he felt that the series was pretty made, and they could worship. However, because of his success, he will return only a few years later with a "final destination 5." As he said:

Ad

"I realized that we were over. Then, behold, opening the weekend. We are like," ah, well, here we go. " (...) I think the fourth is good at all.

And indeed, "Final Destination 5" is a much better movie. It was also made for $ 40 million, and returned with impressive $ 157 million in earnings. The need to see that people accidentally die were not diminished. 14 years later, we have the sixth film in the series, and /the movie loved that. Death lives further.