Yes, I am that man - my friend who was bravely in the Norman Rockwell smoke. I have the courage to say what we have all been afraid to admit for 20 years: when George Lucas made his latest film "War on the Starwives", "Episode III" in 2005, "Episode III" in 2005, "Revenge of SIT", made its Magnum Opus. Convicted by the beginning of two predecessors who received critics and filmmakers also in unprecedented Tisis, The last foretaker of "Starwell War" It was also rejected by many films as terribly directed, poorly drawn and poorly made.

Ad

But that's wrong. Search your feelings, you know it's true.

Yes, I admit that I am a "foretold child"-one of those millennia of Dang, born too late to see the original trilogy "War of Starwelles" in theaters, but only to think that the theaters came out. Let me mark with my older brother in the theater because this will be my last chance to see a movie "War of the Starwides" on the big screen. Loop battle.

Ad

I was an ideal member of the audience for the "Revenge of Sit", even though I was young enough to close my eyes when Anakin (Hayden Christensen) turned into a burnt end of Texas. I have played "Lego War of Starwives" and "War of the Starvala Battlefront II" religious on my PlayStation 2 - two matches that are crucial to the "Starwells War" experience of my generation that came out within the six -month window of "revenge". And yet, I was still quickly a victim of the popular sense of time, largely thanks to the early target of YouTube that made feces of foretelling daily practice. I came to accept that "SIT's revenge" is a disaster. But I'm not right. And so do you.

To start, let's look at that massive, glittering issue with the "revenge of SIT" that cannot fix the number of redirects: it is the sexist franchise "Starwell War" so far. The galler to turn Padme (Natalie Portman) from the action hero and the opposition political leader in "What will we do?" The Womanic that is defined by pregnancy and dying of a broken heart is ... It's pretty unforgivable. And it's an extra shame because the rest of the film, for all its queer, is an amazing kind.

Ad

Like all predictions, "Revenge of SIT" has received significant criticism of his dialogue, acting and a strong reliance on special effects. Lines like "I Have High Land" and "Unlimited Power" have become some of the largest memes in "Starwells War" - lines that feel impossible not to laugh. But is it so wild to suggest that the point was together? Lucas once said that the films "War of Starwells" were, in essence, quiet films "Because they are stories that are told visually; and in quiet films the connection between image and music is everything." His dialogue is a less way to carefully develop the story and another method by which he can create these moments with a greater life, a crescent-friendly.

Ad

"Sit's revenge" is opera - not that it is high art, but in the fact that the emotional circumstances of the story define the larger world. Table like Anakin crying in the council's councils, thinking about Padme, the leading clone troops in the temple EDI, locked in Grapol with Obi-Wan (Evan McGregor) to Mustafar, while lava erupts behind them-these moments are the whole point of the film. It is a story painted with the greatest possible blows, which certainly makes the details work a little funny when you zoom in. But it is clear that Lucas's intention was together.

Through six films, George Lucas has tried to combine the aesthetics and film of the old scientific adventure series with the wide readability of the mitopoietic EP. And, to be clear, those original films "War of Starwells" are fantastic - better than most standard metric of film criticisms, perhaps because Lucas initially had less singular control. But at the same time, it is so clear that "Revenge of Sit" is the film he wanted to do together - something that mixed the high melodrama, bold audiovisusi, Greek tragedy, acting of weddings and contemporary criticism of American neoliberalism.

Ad

Fans often call them "Shakespeare" in their defense, which I think is a little out of the base. Shakespeare's characters live in an elevated world, of course, but one of a different kind. "SIT Revenge" is ballet, puppet shade, comedy dell'arte. It is a place where suits show your moral alignment, where General Geres is a monster in the cave, where you laugh at watching a wicked emperor achieving top -notch power because it is Just so funny. Emotional circumstances rise so high that twist in something else in full. The artefite of special effects is obvious, but maybe in order. You should not see this world as real, nor its dialogue as natural. It is the scene decorated with blinding pieces, a flight loft, a smoke machine, brought by the orchestra in the pit.

Ad

These days there are so few single blockbusters. Regardless of the angle, almost everything from a certain scale seems to be directed to the center of the Bellvonet curve. Maybe it's because we all harassed Lucas so hard in the early 2000s that no studio franchise dared to try it again, at least not with that kind of budget and in the spotlight. But sitting in the theater for my 20th anniversary "SIT Revenge" screeningI can't help, but I don't think about how well you can make a movie as it can be done today, simply by throwing a completely different style, full of clean confusing tone, in the mix. I do not claim that abstraction and the extreme clown make the film objectively better. But I think if you see the "revenge of SIT" embracing what Lucas has set to do, there is no doubt that this is his masterpiece.