Prince HarryThe interview has caused a return punch after stating King Charles"Health in the Bombeshel interview in the middle of the Bricin battle for the fight against the British monarch.

The Duke from Susseks also admitted that he and his father did not speak and expressed fears for the safety of his family in the UK.

Critics, including royal insiders and commenters, have now slammed the applications of Prince Harry as "inconspicuous" and "confusing", especially in the middle of the treatment of King Charles cancer.

Harry is under fire following the remarks about Charles's health made during the disclosure of the BBC interview.

In the interview, the Prince opened about deepening between him and the royal family and expressed a desire to heal the old wounds, despite the discovery that his father, the 76-year-old monarch does not currently talk to him.

He also mentioned that he didn't know "how long" his father must live. The interview comes after Harry lost the legal appeal against the arrangements of personal safety in the UK.

Although he can decide to escalate the matter to the Supreme Court, the decision has added another layer of tension to his already broken connections with Royals.

"There was so much disagreement between myself and some of my family," Harry admitted, a Daily mail. "Of course, I will never forgive me a lot of things, but ... there is no point in fighting more."

He added, "Life is precious. I don't know how much my father doesn't have it anymore; he won't talk to me for these safety things. It would be nice to reconcile."

After the interview, critics were accused of Harry to encourage unnecessary speculation on Charles Health.

Alice Anderson, former press secretary, was criticized by the Duke as "amazing", especially given the king's treatment for the unusual cancer form.

Talking Sky NewsAnderson noted that the royal family was probably "raising the view of heaven", warning that such statements would only "cause the right to the general public about what his diagnosis is, which is his diagnosis that is incredibly embarrassed.

She noticed, "What you don't want to do is like your private life in the media. So if you really want reconciliation, you will do it private, not in the BBC interview."

The Richard Fitzwilliams commentator echoed Anders's feeling, because Branded Harry's interview "confusing."

Fitzwilliams suggested that Harry implies that Charles, in his ability as a monarch, has the power to resolve the current security dispute, but they decided not to intervene.

"He didn't say exactly, because his father would deviate to the side and let the experts decide. But then, on the other hand, it meant that his father was part of the process that was against him," Fitzwilliams explained.

The royal commentator added: "I think people will think of confusing, because, in my opinion, confused."

Controversy around Harry's recent interview is intensified as to appear new requirements, suggesting that Charles was open to repair a broken relationship so far.

According to the Royal Insider who quoted SunThe king hoped reconciliation with a remote son, but it was believed that any potentially re-merging on how Harry deals with the outcome of his legal battle for safety.

However, Charles say that the performance and irritated the recent actions of his son.

The source claimed that Charles was especially frustrated by the financial stress of the Harry's legal case, which was placed on the taxpayers and comments Prince supporters by suggesting monarch "are not interested in (duke) families.

Insider found himself to say that Harry's choice in the last few years, in combination with a public outburst dispute, only deepened family clearance.

"The king has always thought that it was a question for his government and the courts to address himself and to intervene in any way in any way was constitutionally irregular," they explained.

The source added: "What frustrated and upset it on a more personal level was to respect this principle - and that his supporters would enter his family and require the form of protection that the leading national protection experts may or may not take into account necessary in any visit."