Pixar once tried to launch a bizarre spin-off based on their worst franchise

It has been generally agreed that Johnon Laseter's "Cars" in 2006 is One of Pixar's less ambitious films. Other films in Canon Pixar have been surprised by the imagination by presenting the secret worlds of the usual creatures. The "Toy Story" assumed that our toys were revived when we didn't look for (which we always knew was true). "The Life of the Bug" saw the ants as they were deployed in a small, secret society, while "finding it" did the same with fish. "Monsters, Inc." He said that closets monsters are real, but that they only frighten children as an element of boring work with blue-collar. Back to the monster's monster, the monsters are boring like your father.

Ad

The "cars" was a departure for the studio because there was no secret to discover. The "cars" took place in a parallel universe in which living things were replaced by anthropomorphic vehicles. They had eyes instead of windshields and mouths on their bumpers. It seemed to eat gasoline. The "Cars" films allowed many penalties, but were only attractive to really, really young children (and Kerchow Memari). Of course, there is a place for that ("cars" probably made billions of ice cream cakes and birthday materials), but many still feel "cars" is one of Pixar's least impressive movies. "Cars 2" even Sea. "Cars 3" is actually pretty good.

Many probably remember that there was a spinoff series "Cars". In 2013 and 2014, Disney took the idea of ​​Pixar and expanded it to its own mini-franchise of successful aircraft films. What fewer people might know is that Pixar tried to restart the franchise for the second time in the 2020s with a now freaky film that they would call "Metro". "Metro" would also be for anthropomorphic vehicles, but this time, it would be in the New York subway car. The project was developed four years before giving up.

Ad

Aircraft, trains and cars: The Chinese Universe of Cars

As described in detail in Article in ForbesMetro was developing in connection with "Aircraft 3." Although the aircraft films were not very well considered, they were huge hits, making $ 387 million between the two, and Disney was certainly interested in keeping the ball. The aircraft, as stated, was not a project of Pixar, but was taken out of Disneysnut studio. However, it was advertised as "World Upstairs" cars, so the audience was encouraged to think about them as part of the same franchise. It was perhaps because of the association that the "aircraft" and its sequel ", the aircraft: fire and rescue" were hits. /The movie was certainly preparing for "Fire & Rescue" Once, long ago.

Ad

As early as 2017, at the D23 Press event, Disney announced a film called "Space", which was supposed to see the character "aircraft" flying in the upper parts of the Earth's atmosphere. "Space" was originally scheduled for publishing in 2019, but Disney Town Studio closed in 2018Complete project cancellation. It seems that the "space" or "aircraft 3" was already deep in production when it was preserved; Forbes said more than $ 34.7 million was already spent on the film.

Disney may be ready to eat $ 34.7 million because it was only a small part of the giant cinema universe between Disney and Pixar's vehicle together. The artist of the story Bill Perkins revealed that she was making some early artwork for spin-off film "Cars" called "Trucks" (unrelated to the movie Steven King). Disney/Pixar also worked on a boats movie (probably called "boats"), and another steam train film.

Ad

However, the deepest in production was "Metro", Pixar's production for trains in the subway. Of all the films in the Chinese Universe of the vehicle, the Metro looks like the strangest.

Who drives the subway?

As mentioned, however, "cars" take place in the universe without humans (some even theorized that it is a movie after the apocalypse). Older children may immediately wonder who makes cars, or why cars still have features available to man, such as returning mirrors and mirrors. There is even listening to the films "Cars", which tells him to ask what they are wearing. The movie "Metro" will have to be held in a world where the trains in the subway are driven by ... well, cars. If someone is a car, then the train should not be driven.

Ad

"Metro" was supposed to be directed by Steve Loger ("Rehn and Stampa Show", "Kim Possible", "Tinker Bell and Neverbeast Legend"), Who once said on Twitter That he worked for flickering for four years. He described the story as a cross between "Specific Walter Hill's 70s and a specific 80s movie", "probably refers to the" driver "and maybe" after hours ". Ermeurmain Fowler was supposed to play the main character in the subway, and he was supposed to have a friend of a bulk named Fumes. Some of the production art are published On the web pages of the fan. The Metro seems to have been closed long before the date of release in 2021, however, maybe another victim of Disneys' closure.

Ad

Instead, Pixar worked on the TV series "Cars" called "car cars", written by "Sam and Max" Guru Steve Persel. That play aired on Disney+ in 2022. Since then there has been no movie about the Cinema Car Universe.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *