Thursday (April 24), the judges blocked the threats of Trump Administration to cut federal funding for public schools, According to the associated press. President Donald Trump cut the school funds diversity, equity and inclusion programs. However, the judges focused on the issue of the National Education Association and the American Liberties Union. The court mentioned that the Republican administration is "constitutional fuzzy" and violating the first-time correction rights of teachers.

Related: What is next? President Trump speaks student loans after signing the executive command to finish the Department of Education

What do you know about Trump directives?

Monthly, the States ordered to collect signatures from local school systems that meet the laws of civil regions. This excludes what the federal government calls "illegal practices".

Meanwhile, the directives do not have the power of the law behind them. However, civil rights prohibit enforcement to remove call internship schools. The administration warned that schools "follow the internships of federal law" "Finalize the lawsuit of the Department of Justice and Federal Contracts and Federal Contracts.

In February, the Department gave a note to schools and schools to finish the practices to distinguish people based on race. The states were given until Thursday (April 24) to send a certificate of compliance with the schools. However, some expressed that they do not have the order.

The February Notice of the department also has said that schools have promoted call efforts while they throw American students and Asian Americans under the bus. 2023 The Supreme Court is based on a dramatic interpretation of a decision. The decision makes the use of the race in university acceptances in all aspects of education. These aspects are hiring, promotion, scholarships, housing, graduation ceremony and campus life.

Meanwhile, a April letter directive asked States to collect the certificate form of the local school districts and sign the name of the state. Letters want to ensure that the school is following the VI Civil Rights Act Directions. School and states are already necessary for this impact on separate procedures. But the new form is called the language. Language warns that the use of discriminating diversity programs can cause cuts, fines, and other penalties. The form threatens access to schools I threaten access to the title, the largest federal source of K-12 education and lifestyle for low-income schools.

Indexes of diversity programs Indexes

On Thursday, Maryland's second judge reported the orientation against the US Department of Education. In Washington, a third Judge of DC blocked another provision.

In the US Court Landa McCafferty Judge In New Hampshire he said the April Letter is not clear when the Department implies the call program or such programs violating civil rights law. "Letter does not define the" call program " McCafferty wrote. The judge also said that the actions of the department believes that the voicemail rights of teachers are violated by the voicemail rights.

"A teacher is a letter from 2025. If you think racism is structural, but it does not deny the structural existence of racism. That is the textbook's point of view," McCafferty wrote.

In Maryland, the US district Stephanie Gallagher Referee Delayed this memory. He said that Memo was not properly issued. According to the court, teachers also choose "Being injured by eliminating their lecture or enforcing constitutional rights." The Federation of American teachers, one of the unions of national teachers, wore.

"The court agreed that this fuzzy and clear condition was a serious attack on our profession, honest history and knowledge of the knowledge," Randi Weingarten, President of the Aft, said in a statement.

Also in Washington, a judge of DC issued a preliminary order against the certificate letter. Naacp argued that identifying specific call practices that would violate the law. The three courts say the guidance limits academic freedom. They also claim the letter and in Limbo's schools and educators can make leaves and educators. For example, it does not explain that voluntary student groups for minority students are accepted.

What should the Secretary of Education say?

The Secretary of the President of Donald Trump President, Linda McMahon, is according to the directives of Trump. He has previously warned of potential funding for potential financing if the States do not return the form on Friday. In an interview with the Azeri Business Network Tuesday, McMahon said the statues that refuse to sign "Defend a danger in their districts." Is the purpose of the form "To ensure that there is no discrimination that is happening in one of the schools" He said.

Related: Did you get student loans by default? The Department of Education comes to collect its coins!

Associated Press staff helped Holly Ramer and Collin Binkley in this report.