"Avengers: Doomsday" and "Avengers: The Secret Wars" are on their way, and their collective The role will be even greater than we thought (Although they will not be the inclusion of each stage 4 character). The Rousseau brothers are also returning to their directors' chairs to bring this next phase of the Marvel film universe to the climate end. Oh yes, and Robert Downey Runior is back, This time as a supervisor doctor doom.

Ad

Since we are preparing for a fresh era of cross -mutilation of MCU, it is fun to look back on the legacy that has built the basis for these monumental Chinese projects. In particular there were four films Avengers Action Action, especially in MCU to date. The first started the group of the eponymous group of the Great Screen in 2012, with the last one to bring Tanos to knees seven years later.

Each flick "avengers" is special in its own way. But who are better than others? Let's take a quick journey after the memory bar by ranking the quartet of films in the franchisee "Avengers" from worst to first, right?

The first on the list, and the most common of the four films is "Avengers: Ultron's Age". Now, right outside the gate, let's clarify one thing: all four of these films are amazing projects with good acting, many welcoming visual effects and attractive stories that make them worth watching.

Ad

Case in point: Although this generally comes to the last of the most ranked lists (and is often quite low in the MCU rank in general), it is still full of important and unforgettable moments. This is the story of Wanda Maksimoff (Elizabeth Olsen). It explores the stone of the mind, helping to set the saga for an infinite war. She is a witness to the birth of the sight (Paul Bethany), along with the creation of Ultron (Jameses Spider) and introduces Hokiki's family (Ereeremi Rehn). It also sets tensions for Captain America: Civil War and gives Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) his initial moment moving to Milik. And do not forget about that goal credit scene where Thanos (Oshosch Brolin) is preparing to "do it alone".

Ad

Like all MCU crossovers, there is a lot to be dissected here - and a lot of enjoyment. However, this is also part of what drags this down. The film lags a little, partly due to its own weight of multiple characters of characters and excessive storytelling. It is lacking direction (except for Ultron's apparent business activity) and is more important as a way to set exciting events outside their own time of 141 minutes. It is enough to say, although it is critical, this is not the experience of the avengers that naturally climbing over others by their merits.

When it came out, the "avengers" was a show-to-life show. After four years of teasing at the end of loans and juvenile character, this was the first major multi-heroic cut in MCC. The film pastes the original six vengies through the initial formation and early growing pain. It shows them that they are gathering around the death of Agent Coulson (Clark Greg) and go through their initial trials as they try to stop Loki supported by Tanos (Tom Hiddleston). It also doubles the first time we see the crazy titanium on the screen and reveals more about the previous crossover characters such as "Black Widow" (Scarlett Johansson) and Hokiki. On top of that, the film introduces the processed Bruce Banner (by taking over Mark Rufalo After Edward Norton's term as Hulk created an institutional change in MCC operations).

Ad

Around this film there is so much to offer, and absolutely glues the landing when it comes to its function as an introduction to this critical team in MCC. That said, it comes in third of the four films "Avengers", simply because it's not big enough. The film, in essence, is a story of origin (though for a group instead of an individual), and while they are exciting, they are rarely the most interesting and attractive narratives. When well done, they provide the necessary foundation that sets the Earth to come to the more intriguing drama - and that is something that makes the "avengers" with an apology.

"Avengers: Endgame" and "Avengers: Infinite War" are the neck and neck for the top of this list. Both are incredible cinema feats that successfully fight dozens of well -known actors, complex stories and a universe that shoots the seams in size and size. That said, one of them had to be found in a second, and "Endgame" did so for several different reasons.

Ad

Let's start with a simple statistical analysis. Both films "Avengers" are currently ranked among the first 250 IMDB films of all time (the other two). But while each has an 8.4-star rating, Endgame is 75, while the "infinite war" is 61. Of course, our ranking is based on more than IMDB rating, but the nature of that list, sources of the crowd, says a lot when it comes to comparison this close.

"Endgame" is epic and complex, but as is the case of "Ultron's Age", the complexity can be a two -edged sword. It is so much that it becomes difficult to strive for every individual and story and still move to a satisfactory conclusion. Speaking of conclusions, every movie where you have to bring a decade of intertwined cinema and tens of hours of overlapping stories of a happy ending, facing an almost impossible task. No matter how you cut it, someone (and often many of one's) will be upset by any decision you make. From the decision to kill the Black Widow and the Ironeles Man (Downey Runior) to the way Thanos died of use on time as "we can do it all" McGufin, there is only enough dragging this down to keep it from first place. It leaves us with ...

Ad

"Avengers: Infinite War" is the biggest film "Avengers" to this day. Along with the highest ranked of the four films in the franchise by the general public, the film fulfills the impossible: to tell its huge story, maintain incredible emotional deposits and build a remarkable intensity without being bothered in the details.

Ad

The key to this success? Tanos.

Thanos is a clear central figure of "Avengers: Infinite War". He drives the story forward and, critically, carries the different, far -reaching elements of MCU together in one, stunning narrative. Tanos's MCU version is also filled with a crusader -like fate, elevating his comic book story and helping focusing on the plot of one, a furiously -managed goal throughout the two -year -old experience. Add the scale and volume of the film to the mixture and have a recipe for success.

All this does not even refer to one of the greatest things that helps this to stand out: the end. The Final moments of "Avengers: Infinite War" (which Mark Rufalo gloriously spoiled A year earlier) sets the stakes as high as possible and then does not pull its shot. At the first clock, it leaves fans destroyed and desperate for the next chapter of the saga. From his central villain to his crossover power to his high -end conspiracy, this creates one of the greatest experiences in the entire MCC canon. The only way you can plant at this point is if RDJ returns because Dr. Doom can somehow take this universe to movie comics at even higher heights. Our suggestion to withdraw that? Do not drag the blows. Said Naf.

Ad