Diddy's infamous “freak-off” videos can be displayed on his trial

Sean "Diddy" Čeljev"The legal team filed a list of proposed issues for potential jurors that suggest that its infamous" freak-off "videos can be presented as evidence when the trial of his sexual crime is starting next month.

The questionnaire containing 70-plus questions will help them determine the potential representation of a wiring jury to sexually explicit videos, videos that show physical attack and their opinion on people with multiple sexual partners.

At the upcoming trial, Sean "Diddy" Complies is Faced with federal charges Conspiracy of the racket, two points of sexual trade by force, and two points of transport to involve prostitution.

The article continues below the advertisement

Why did Diddy's lawyer want the potential jurors to complete the questionnaire

Sean "Diddy" Čeljev
Mega

Before Baddy's trial for sex crimes, his lawyers sent a proposed questionnaire that could end potential jurors.

The questionnaire allegedly contains more than 70 probing questions, and some with multiple subscriptions.

The legal team in the accompanying letter explained the question behind the question, stating that they aim to move the readiness of potential jurors to view videos containing sexual explicit content or displays of physical attack, according to the words Associated Print.

They also noticed the intention to assess the views of jurors about individuals who had more sexual partners.

The article continues below the advertisement

The questionnaire suggests that diddy's 'freak off' videos will be displayed during the trial

Sean P. Diddy comb on 77. Academic award on Sunday, 27. February 2005 in Kodak Theater in Hollywood in California.
Mega

The latest move of Diddy's lawyers strongly suggested that the alleged rapper alleged "freak-off" videos can be displayed as evidence during the trial.

Videos were made during the raid in Diddy's home early last year and played a significant role in securing his indictment.

They are also described as "elaborated and produced sexual performances" involving Diddy's female victims and male prostitutes.

The article continues below the advertisement

Diddy's legal team could not reach a consensus on the questionnaire

Sean Combs P.Diddy saw her leaving a business meeting for revolt
Mega

According to the exit, Diddy's lawyers sent a questionnaire without the blessings of prosecutors.

Both sides could not reach a consensus on what should contain, and the defense claiming that potential jurors are allowed to write free writing about "unseen media care", which may have been "exposed."

This includes the potential jurors watching critical programs about Diddy from his arrest, like "Diddy's fall," "Diddy do it?" "Pad Diddy" and "Diddy: making a bad guy."

The article continues below the advertisement

Shooting for defense, prosecutors wrote in their letter that the suggested questions "extremely irrelevant for the ability to service the jury" were proposed. They also claimed that the questionnaire was too long, which could lead to inadequate answers.

After the court decides, the final list of issues will be shared by the end of April and be filed on the eve of the Voir touch process, during which the defense and prosecutors will question the juror.

The article continues below the advertisement

Raper lawyers encourage prosecutors to limit the testimony into four alleged victims appointed in the indictment

Diddy comb with your key for New York City
Mega

Earlier in the week, Diddy lawyers sent a move to the bar all witnesses to testify except the four alleged victims appointed in the Federal Indictment.

"The court should require the government to try the case, accused and prove that case with a jury out of reasonable doubt," said Diddy lawyers in the submission Daily mail.

They added: "The Government should not be polluted with decades of dirt and invite the certificate based on the proof of preference without proper purpose by taking the Gospoder with the Gospoder as a bad guy who must have committed charges."

Further claimed his case, the Defense claimed that prosecutors refused a growing newspaper to the 18th. April, which would seemingly leave them unprepared to choose the jury to take place only two weeks later.

The article continues below the advertisement



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *