Prince Harry Still fighting to bring back protection for her and her wife, Meghan MerkelFive years after the UK government pulled it.
Harry, 40, Spent two days London's Royal Courts of the Justice of Justice for Appeal Hearing on February 2021, when they decided to leave the UK on the decision to pull the security of the couple
Sussex Duke describes the decision Telegraph As "hard to swallow" and earlier indicated that the matter was a reason for his father's crack with his father, King Charles ThirdThe
Guys Man On Wednesday, April 9, he was leaving the court that he was "tired and overwhelmed", Harry added that his "worst fears have been confirmed by the whole legal manifestation in this case and it is really sad."
Harry and Megan (1) first announced that they were withdrawing from public responsibility in January 2021. Queen Elizabeth II According to a letter from the king's personal secretary of the late king, Elizabeth believes that they believed to be "essential" to iron the details of their departure, " Sir Edward YoungThe
However, the Royal & VIP Executive Committee has reached the conclusion that if Harry and Meghan want to live a personal life, they do not "easily fit" within the structure of the organization. Ravec ordered their protection to be drawn at the end of March.
Harry and Meghan are now Live in Montchito, California With their two children, son Archie, 5, and daughter Lilibet, 3. He saw the removal of protection as a revenge and thought that the couple was strategy to hold the couple into the Royal family.
"We were trying to build this happy house," he said Telegraph Following the hearing.
In an attempt to re -establish the details of his protection, he applied for a judicial review in January 2022. The UK High Court ruled against him in 2021, Lead to the process of appeal It carried at 2025.
Sir James Eddie CaseyAn official barrister, criticized Harry's appeal in a written statement.
"(Home Office) has treated and continues in a basepok manner (home office)."
Barrister Martyr Fatima Casey During the appeal process, Ravec's "expert analysis was not required" to determine whether Harry "other VIPs" should be taken. "
"On January 7, 2021 (Harry) and his wife were forced to withdraw from the royal working members of the royal family, they thought they were not protected by the institution, but they wanted to continue their duties in support of the late Queen as a member of the private fund of the royal family," he argued with a written submission.
?xml>?xml>Source link