Blake Lively's The legal party has accused of Justin The complaint is the side of the use of "burning world case" to prevent the complaint of sexual harassment.

Esra Hudson And Mike GotlibLawyer for lively, shared a statement Our weekly Thursday, April 10, on April 10, accusing Baldoni the laws of defending the accused "tearing".

"Mr. Baldoni, from cashing to a brand dedicated to women's faith and support, is to lead this allegation to tear up the law that protects women coming forward with sexual harassment, harassment and discrimination." Statement Ours Read "California's sexual harassment, AB 933, the law was applied to stop sexual harassment criminals from abusing the defamation case to sue their accused."

Lively and Baldoni behind the legal back, who have worked together It ended with us, When was the beginning of December 2024 Vibrant Sexual harassment and handling a "smirger promotion" against him. In the same month, started separate suit against Baldoni (41) New York TimesWho said of the allegations, and lively, 37, Defamation Among other claims. (All parties involved have sharply denied all allegations against them.)

In Thursday's statement, Hudson and Gotlib added that the legal techniques of Baldoni's team sent a "cool message".

“Cold message Flammable world suit The sends are silent or destroyed to the victims, "the statement is written in the statement. Mrs. Lively will show all the victims that they are not alone, they do not have to be silent, and the law is in their favor."

Lively team filed an answer on Thursday, April 10 because they dismissed by trying to sue the actress, claiming that the documents were seen Our weekly "Wafer's parties have been involved in the knot to demand defamation against Mrs. Lively, which is not forbidden by the Statute of Limitations in its legal complaint, which they acknowledge that no functional claims can form the basis."

Last month, Lively's lawyers filed a proposal to dismiss While calling Baldoni's claim “Vengeful and shaking” and abuse of legal system. The papers argued that California Civil Code Article 47.1 The public harassment has banned revenge cases involved in public harassment.

Baldoni's attorney, Brian Friedman, Baldoni's allegations were reacted on Thursday, April 3, which was complained that "Bileni and his Weefer's Studios Production team" was provided with full control over the movie "The Child -made Counting Details" was provided "in total control over the film" It ends with us And then when his plan failed to make their insults and forcibly go ””

"The circle of Mrs. Lively and her Hollywood elite may not prevent my clients from exercising their constitutional rights to clear their names from her false and harmful claims,” Read Friedman's statement on April 3.

The response continued: "This right does not protect only Mr. Baldoni and Wefer's parties in this particular case, but in the future all Americans who have made false accusations against them and sought relief from our judicial system. It will certainly stop here, and we will fight to prevent access to the court system and to weaken our country constitution."