37-year-old actress Blake Lively doubles in its permanent legal war against "ends with us of the director and asterisk Justin Baldoniaccusing him to use aggressive tactics of civil litigation litigation for the silence of the statement of sexual harassment.

On Thursday, she was lively and her legal team issued a firing new statement, condemn Baldoni's briefing lawsuit in the amount of $ 400 million as a revalued attack on her right.

In response, Baldoni filed a clearing of slander not only against lively, but also her husband Ryan Reynolds and a longtime Publicist Leslie Sloane. He also attended the law New York TimesSubmission of a separate $ 250 million Commission through its reporting case.

All parties appointed in Baldoni's lawsuits denied allegations.

In a statement for Now per weekVibrant lawyers wrote:

"Mr. Baldoni went from the monetization of the brand dedicated to the faith and support of women, to lead the accusation of the drying of the law itself, which protects women who are attacked on sexual assault, harassment and discrimination."

They stated the California Statute of AB 933, the Law on Privileging Sexual Harassment is intended to prevent the perpetrator from the use of defamatory suits for the silence of victims. "Chilling messages Scorched pering pends to the victims is sent to the victim or destroying," Lively's Tec said.

The remarks were monitored by the new response submission submitted in the cast name, which claims that Baldoni's claims are not only occupation, but also legally prohibited.

"The position of the WASFARER party that the shamors of the lady of the lively retaliah's lawsuit ... is not only miserable just to expose them to significant economic damage," the reading is short. "Ms. Lively will continue to show all the victims that they are not alone, that they do not have to stay silent and that the law is on their side."

This latest bumper only comes a week after Baldoni live a lively staging delay in public to impair his career. Claimed that Her attempt to discard the slanderFiled 20. March, was calculated by the effort to "ruin the reputation and career of the important parties".

In its submitted Baldoni, Baldoni defended his lawsuit as the exercise of the first amendment to submit a court encouragement.

Lively lawyers, Mike Gottlieb and ESRA Hudson, in effect, responded to Baldoni's framing, speaking TMZ:

"Justin Baldoni, a man who built his brand allegedly speaking for the victims, believes that the first amendment of victims of victims of sexual assault and harassment should give way in the rights of the perpetrator to sue his victims in oblivion."

Her legal team accused Baldonija and his lawyer, Bryan Freedamana, trying to dismantle protection for victims as they discourage others to speak.

In response, Freedman pushed back to the statement Daily mailby saying:

"Such a bent statement makes it very clear that Mrs. Mercy and Tim rattle and once again resort to remembering the remarks to focus with real facts."

Freedman continued to criticize the focus in former media media, saying that the Ms. lively and her team suddenly talked so passionately about the right-won community for the whole film campaign ... of hair care and hair care and hair care. "