Prince HarryThe legal team claimed that "separated" for inferior treatment "when his security reduced his decision to stop a higher royal life.

The request was made during the first procedure in the appeal on the reduction of its safety by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Copyright and Public Persons (Ravec).

Meanwhile, a lawyer who represents a home office slammed the decision of the Prince Harry to complain as "a continuous failure in seeing trees for trees,

Prince Harry's appeal over the reduction of his security after his royal exit is underway, with his legal team, he opens a challenge to strong statements, by Daily mail.

Duke, Shaheed Fatima KC, claimed that Harry "was singled out for a different, unjustified and inferior treatment" by the parent office. The decision on the reduction of his security was performed through Ravec in early 2020. years after Harry and his wife Meghan maked, they resigned from the higher working royal royals.

Further claims, Fatima KC told the Court that Ravec does not receive a risk management committee before exposing Harry to "Bespoke process" for its current security arrangement.

She also claimed that this assessment, which is the key part of the Ravec process, has yet to be put available despite Harry's safety threats in recent times.

Fatima KC then pointed out that Judge against Harry "failed to rate the role of Risk Analysis) in the decision-making of Ravec" and also made a mistake in two other aspects of "construction and evaluation criteria conditions."

Responding to the strong statements of Prince Harry's legal team, representing the registry office, claiming that the Duke no longer qualifies for its previous level of security, because there is no more cohort of individuals whose security position remains in a regular review by Ravec.

He also stated that Judge "is right to be done as if Ravec had the final authority in Prince Harry's arrangement" Bespoke "against the Fatima KC argument that the judge" wrongly and inappropriately delayed Ravec. "

Eadie KC further pointed out that Harry appeals were reflected "a continuous failure in the view of the trees for the trees, progressing suggestions available only by reading the small pieces of evidence and now the verdict, outside the context and neglecting the image total."

Unlike today's proceedings, which were translated, tomorrow's session will be held behind closed doors.

The decision brought judges Sir Geoffrey Vos, Lord Justice Beans and Lord Justice Edis due to some evidence expected to be presented "highly confidential".

"Some evidence in this case, which are placed before the Appellation Court, are agreed between the parties to be very confidential," the judges say. "This evidence refers to security arrangements and threat levels and assessments for applicants and other public figures."

Furthermore, they claimed that the content of evidence "was of interest to whom they want to harm the person within security arrangements." So, allowing tomorrow's process that is published ", risk the endangering efficiency of these arrangements."

Prince Harry arrived at the court 73 of the Royal Courts of Justice at about 9:30. He marked his first performance in the UK for more than six months.

He was dressed in a formal clothing consisting of a dark suite paired with a white shirt and pale blue pattern.

Duke arrived with short security details and offered a slight smile to some journalists who are present to cover the proceedings.

He is also familiar with the question of a journalist who wonder if he talked to his father upon arrival from Los Angeles on Sunday. Harry, however, decided not to answer the inquiry.

After entering the courtroom, he took his headquarters in the last row of three benches behind his legal team.

As the Duke and Duchess Sussex still live as a non-working royal royal, Meghan is allegedly longing for a husband to be free from the drama courtroom.

Harry is fighting for the home office to return his police protection for himself and his family after they took him away when they left his royal duties 2020. Years.

The former employee of the Foundation for Pair's Steam Para is now said People Magazine That the former "outfits" actress "supports Harry 100 percent, but she wants to let go of these lawsuits, be happy at this time."

"He wants him to be acquitted of all that, but she also knows what has passed (her love of (her and their children), he can't live in the world," he added that, "he added that," the source added.