Jonon Javre's "Ironeles 2" is the third film in Marvel's film universe, but it was really the first. Favre's "Ironi -Ellerican" two years before it was a huge production, but it was not yet part of a big plan for interconnection of the characters from Marvel's "Avengers" comics. Her post-credit Stinger, which houses Samuel L. Acksexone as it was Nick Hurray, said Javre, only to be a cute fans, not as a statement of intention. Also, Louis Letrier's "Incredible Hulk" of the same year, while boasting a fun arrival from the actor "Ironeca man" Robert Downey Runior, has not yet been tied to any wide corporate plans. (It has been obtained since A sequel to a variety of "Captain America: The Brave New World".) By 2009, however, Disney bought Marvel and put MCC in production seriously, starting with the "Ironoela Man 2."

Ad

Ask every MCU fan, however, and they will tell you that "Ironieline man 2" was, at best, a rock start For soon the dominant film property. Too much time to advertise the upcoming events and the insufficient time of the characters ahead of us - and, naked, there were many, many characters to follow. (A little miracle Havreu has swore to direct the MCU films after this). There were also Scarlett Johansson as Natasha Romanof and two new villains played by Sam Rockwell and Mickey Rourke. "Ironieline man 2" is no favorite, and even his team would tell you so much

Ad

Case in point: Rourke was played by Ivan Vanko Aka Vipatash, a Russian villain equipped with powerful electric whipes that can cut cars in half. Although Rourke studied hard for the role, he admitted that the "Iron Man 2" was a weak image as a whole and that his character kind of sucking. Speaking with Craveonline in 2011 (As prescribed by complex), the actor said he tried to give Wiples some texture and depth, but that, according to the studio's term, he was retained one -dimensional and uninteresting.

It seems that Vipses never had to be terrible sophisticated. In MCU, there are heroes and there are malicious abuses, and most notions of ethical ambiguity are ignored in favor of widely general moral absolute. Rourke did not explain this dynamics, which was frustrating. Marvel did not want a dynamic, rich villain, but a cartoon. As Rourke recalls:

Ad

"You know, I explained to the co-writer of 'Iron Man 2' Justinin Terux) and to Favreu that I wanted to bring some other layers and colors, not just to make this Russian a complete bad man who avenged me. And they allowed me to do it. the floor. ”

Rourke felt betrayed. He thought the Iron Man 2 was supposed to be different from a typical superhero movie, expanding the characters and not obsessing over technology and interconnected, re -examined comics. As we all know now, "Iron Man 2" was obsessed with Oreubov, and there was really just to set the tone of films to follow. Rourke, meanwhile, visited Russian prisonsLearning accent and bringing new Whiplash details to make it more human and idiosyncratic. The Ir was the idea of ​​Rourke to give Whiplash pet cocatu, for example.

Ad

But Marvel was not interested in anything, and that upset Rourke. As he said:

"If they want to make movies for comics without mind, then I don't want to be a part of it. I don't want to worry so much and work so hard, and then fight them for intelligent reasoning, and just because they call on the footage they ... you know, I didn't work for three months on the accent and all the adjustments.

Needless to say, Whiplash has not returned to any of the many, many other MCU films. (Yes, he died at the end of the "Ironeles' man 2" but when there is that Have you ever stopped Marvel's character?) Rourke, it seems, he felt that his ideas house was bad.