Remember when Pixar has changed the animation forever with bold, inventive and otherwise creative "toy story?" How about when the studio continued to be released Original movies that pushed the animation media forward While exploring many different stories and genres (such as "Life of Bugs", "Monsters, Inc." and "The Incredibles")? Of course, there were sequels even in the previous days, but not only did the films like "Toy Story 2" actually secured something new and different from their predecessors, but they were also balanced by Pixar's twice as many original films.

Well, say goodbye to the good old days! Pixar, like her parent company Walt Disney Studios, is now everything to chase the powerful and elusive dollar with artistic extensions that parents will go to China to see because there is virtually nothing else to entertain their children with movies. We already knew Pixar is Making not just another sequel to "Toy Story"But also the third film "Amazing". Now, Disney's executive director who refuses to leave, Bob Iger, has announced that Coco 2 is in active development in Pixar and is aiming for the 2029 theater edition.

"While the film is only in the early stages, we know it will be full of humor, heart and adventure," Iger endangered Promised in a press release. "And we can't wait to share more soon."

"Coco 2", being perfectly honest, is a terrible idea, more than "Toy Story 5" or "Amazing 3." Of course, it makes a lot of sense commercially. Like "Inside Out", the original Coco was the only real hit by Pixar of the 2010s (a decade that gave the studio the first appropriate boxing office with "Good Dinosaur"). And yet, while Coco 2 can prove to A huge shot along the "Inside Out 2" lines, The sequel risks a serious reduction in the cultural influence and the importance of its predecessor.

"Coco" was a beautiful movie, a masterpiece. Not only was there a stunning animation and design design, but also a beautiful story that perfectly depicted Mexican culture and tradition. But Coco is definitely not a movie that is borrowed in the sequel. After all, the title of the film is just a reference to a character passing at the end of the film. Will the sequel simply bring Mami Coco (who was expressed by the late Anna Ophelia Murgua in the first film) back by rethinking her in the land of the dead? Will her great -grandfather Miguel (Anthony Gonzalez) have to solve another mystery involving a secret relative?

The thing is, the story in Coco was not just for Miguel to go into great adventure. It was a growing film, though the one that did not borrow the sequel (even with the upbringing of Miguel once again in focus). Instead, Coco recounts a unique, independent story, complete with a mystery that was resolved and left absolutely no long -term issues, nor is it teasing. The story, a sequel to Coco reads as a creative bankruptcy of paper, like many, many of Disney, directly to a 90s video (like an "extremely stupid movie" or "Hunchback of Notre Dam second").

There has also been the problem with what Disney and Pixar experienced since the announcement of the original Coco. Although Disney's press release says the sequel will also be returned by director Lee Unkrich and co-director/co-writer Adrian Molina, it says nothing about Molina's Textbook, Germermen Franco, Robert Lopez and Kristen Anderson. Will any of them come back beside Molina? Will Disney try to change the style of songs to make it more "commercial" in the sequel? Will he dare bring Lynn-Manuel Miranda just because it can?

Honestly, it is difficult to imagine "Coco 2" to be anywhere near the giant success Coco was creative. But hey, as long as Disney is making money, at least Disney will be happy ...