The Harry Potter film series, which extends from 2001 to 2011, is extremely consistent and coherent. They certainly aren't perfect but we still Got eight movies that all move somewhere from decent to incredible. None bad Film "Harry Potter", unless of course You count the films "Fantastic Astswerers"What I didn't.

Much of that consistency comes down to how the franchise maintained the same screenwriter for each film, except for the fifth. Screenwriter Steve Cloves rested from the property due to the exhaustion of the "Goblet of Fire" writing and returned with a "semi-bleeding prince" to finish those last three films. People want to attribute stories to tell stories in each film by individual directors, but much of the loan should go to cloves, who put a tone of work to understand how to direct these great complicated books in long -term films of reasonable length.

What about what element Kloves gets the most wines? It must be his display of Hermione and Ron, a portrait, which seems to have his favorism towards Hermione to the detriment of Ron. Like cloves Explained in an interview for 2016 Between him and the author of the books, KK. Rowling, he told Rowling early in the production that Hermione was his favorite character. This pleasantly surprised Rowling, as well as Ron's films were largely considered a fan-fueled book.

"(Hermione) had this huge intelligence, but it was really a kind of exciting, frustrating character in the way ... She was like the girl who bothered you at school, but you couldn't stop thinking about her," Cloves explained. When Rowling noted that Hermione was not the "easiest person he wanted," Cloves said, "that was what I liked for her ... What I liked for all the characters were that they were wrong, and almost no one more."

Although Kloves's Fondos for Hermione has convinced Rowling's many early worries about the film adaptations of the Harry Potter movie, she also attracted increased frustration among book fans. The first warning sign that Hermione would be written as a little Also It came perfectly at the end of the first film when she, Harry and Ron, faced the devil's trap during their search to return the philosopher's stone. In the source material, Hermione disperses, and only figures her way out of the situation because Ron reminds her that she has a wand that can use to create fire. In the film, Meanwhile, Hermione is Cool, who tells the boys what to do.

There is a reasonable explanation for this: in the original book, Hermione's great moment to shine is when it solves a logical puzzle a few minutes later. This scene is not very Chinese, however (it is basically minutes from Hermione to do math), so it makes sense that the story told in a visual medium will reduce that encounter and move her heroic moment elsewhere. However, it created the effect of snowballs, as the next movie makes something worse.

In the book version of the "Chamber of Secrets", Hermione and Harry (both raised in Muggl's families) have no idea what the term "cobblestone" means when they first hear it. But as one of the world of magic, Ron immediately understands the word is slurry against the wizards who have two parents of Muggl. This creates an interesting scene where Harry and Hermione do not understand the weight of the situation, but still Ron.

In the adaptation of the film, on the other hand, Hermione knows exactly what "muddy food" means ahead of time, and it is she who explains it to the audience as Ron shoots slaps in the background due to the wrong hexadecimal. It may not look like a big deal, but it's another example of the Harry Potter films that take away one of the highlights of Ron's book. These films have a little time to characterize everyone, so little things as this quickly added, giving the impression that Ron is more useless and uninformed than his colleague from the book and, in turn, that Hermione is smarter and cooler than her colleague than the book.

To date, Ron fans have not yet been angry about film changes, as the "Chamber of Secrets" was definitely the most famous Ron-centric of all books; With Hermiona petrified and outside the commission for most of the last act, Ron still got a lot of time to shine in that film. Only in the next film "Prisoner of Askaban", Hermione's favorism became clear. In one of the best scenes of the book, the badly injured Ron still has hoses to tell Sirius Black (who he still believes is a perverted murder), "If you want to kill Harry, you will have to kill us too!" In the film, the line is handed over to Hermione.

"Prisoner of Askaban" also changes a fun scene in the book where Ron defends Hermione from the abuse of Professor Snip. When the book Snape calls Hermione "powerless knowledge-all that", the book Ron risks detention in Snape and calls it a bad teacher. When the movie Snape (Alan Rickman) calls Hermiona the same thing, Ron cruel reacts: "He has a point, you know."

In defense of this film, this is that "Harry Potter" story where it allows Hermione to take the central scene to have the perfect sense. The "Chamber of Secrets" and "Askaban Prisoner" are basically mirroring each other. The first is when Ron struggles all year with a broken wand and gets a triumphant final act where he proves his value as Harry's friend; The second is when Hermione has been fighting all year with her intense schedule of hours and gets a triumphant final act that proves her value as Harry's friend. Hermione was stolen in the "Chamber of Secrets" serves the same narrative function as Ron to break her leg in Askaban, creating an easy excuse to split one of Harry's friends so that the other friend can get time to shine.

"Askaban" is Hermione's very book, so it makes sense that film adaptation with the limited time would bypass Ron to focus more on Hermione's bow (With all the fun hizens for travel time) as much justice as possible. If this were the end of Hermione's favorism, no one would complain, but there were still five more films to go ...

"Goblet of Fire" is Ron's worst movie by having two of his least attractive stories: His beef with Harry was selected for the Trivizard Tournament and beef with Hermione for Dating Victor Krum. Ron is a total unusual in both of these grounds, but the adaptation of the movie "Gablet of Fire" has no time to properly explore why it is this way. The result was that the book's fans now had four films in a row where Ron was either submitted or shown negatively, and it certainly earned.

Cliules seemed to be at least a little aware of this, and this reflected in his interview '16 with Rowling. "Ron has grown much stronger in scripts for the last three films," he explained. "His family and being a family wizard gives Harry and Hermione at some point and his instincts are sharper than theirs." He also noted that Rupert Grint is an "underestimated" actor.

The statement frustrates many fans, who felt like the appropriate time for Kloves to have such a realization will come back when writing the early films, not the last three. By the time the trio reached the sixth year in Hogwarts, the advantage Ron had as a wizard in the world of magic was nowhere near as great as it was in the first year, when Harry and Hermione were still getting used to everything. Not to mention, Grint was the strongest of the three central actors in those first few films; surely, Daniel Radcliffe has since surpassed others in his (very surprising and varied) career for adultsBut it was Grint that seemed most at the top of things from the first day.

Although I think it's fair to say that Ron has been written more attractive than Kloves in the last few films, it's also fair to say it was too late. The narrative for a clown car Ron and the genius St. Hermione had long been established, and there was no time for cloves to fix it. But hey, maybe The upcoming Harry Potter Restart Series He will finally give the miracle of Ron fans.