Legal battle between Drake And the Universal Music Group (UMG) occupied another turn, and the label was looking for a reopening of the lawsuit.

They descend in the role of Umg in the promotion of Kendrick Lamar's Dish Paszec's "No Like us", who claimed that Drake claimed to lead to harmful consequences.

However, UMG pushes back, claiming that Drake's claims are unfounded. The request, submitted to the beginning on Monday, challenged the legitimacy of Drake's case, stating that it was just an attempt to recover from the public defeat, not a true legal complaint.

In his submissionUniversal Music Group did not stay in criticizing Drake's legal move.

The label claimed that Drake "lost the rap battle he caused and willingly participated," claiming that he had not accepted the outcome, resorted the "glory of his wound".

Furthermore, UMG accused that he pronounced opposites with his attitude on artistic freedom, pointing out that he had previously signed a petition in legal proceedings.

"Drake was right then and now wrong," the request stated, and strengthening his claim that the lawsuit lacks merit.

In his lawsuit, Drake claimed that UMG participation in the promotion "No like us" represents defamation and harassment.

However, UMG claimed that there was no legal basis for those receivables, stating that the song expresses "unparalleled opinion and rhetorical hyperbole, not the fact".

The company also pointed out a perceived double standard, noting that while Drake expects support for their own disk traces, in objects at a similar promotion of Lamar's response.

The label insisted that their actions were in legal and ethical borders and that Drake claims did not meet the necessary criteria for the Tribunal.

Despite the UMG attempt to reject the case, Drake's legal team remains firm in his attitude.

Raper lawyer, Michael J. Gottlieb, claimed that the lawsuit was about more than just rap battle.

Gottlieb said Diversity"Umg wants to pretend to be a rap battle to distract their shareholders, artists, and the public from a simple truth: a greedy company is finally responsible for profiting of dangerous misinformation that has already resulted in multiple works of violence. "

He also suggested that UMG has a history of exploitation of artists and that the case will reveal deeper systemic issues in the music industry.

Gottlieb said: "This request is desperate ploy to avoid responsibility, but we have any trust that this case will continue and continue to digest a long history of threat, abuse and exploit its artists."

The lawsuit, filed in the Federal Court in New York, came after withdrew the legal challenge accusing UMG and Spotify on the artificial inflatable popularity of the song. Umg rejected claims as "illogical."

The lawsuit claimed that UMG priorified "corporate greed due to the safety and well-being of their artists" by distribution "not like us", which marked Drake and "certified pedophile".

He claimed that UMG deliberately promoted the path to spreading "false factual allegations" and encourages damage against Drake.

The suit also pointed out the artistic work of the song, which contained a picture of Drake's house marked similar to the houses of registered sex offenders.

Drake's legal team claimed that UMG consciously published and profits from false claims, holding the label responsible for the impact of the song.

"This lawsuit is not in the artist who created" not like us, "said the submission." Instead, entirely in UMG, the music company who decided to publish, promote, use and cash in allegations that it was not only false, but dangerous. "

However, UMG strongly denied charges, insisting that they significantly contributed to Drake's success.

"Not only do these claims are true, but not to inflict harm to the reputation of any artist - let Kamoli Drake - is illogical," spokesperson stated aside Guardian.

They also accused "one dance" Krono "weapons for the legal process to silence the artist's creative term", despite the benefit of the same industrial practice during his career.