This article contains spoilers for "invincible".

In three seasons, it is safe to say that the "invincible" is one of the best TV shows or streaming. It is visually stunning, awakened by the talents of the Starvala voice team and has some of the strongest writing of any series of genres currently being broadcast. The show is just as good as it was at the end of the season 3, and some of the more expensive adaptations of the block comics could afford to study "invincible". In particular, Marvel's film universe can learn something or two from the final of the season 3 only.

After a season consisting mainly of episodic stories, building characters for Oliver (Christian Converi), Eve (Illiyian Jaceces) and Cecil (Walton Gogins), and Mark (Steven Hun) that grows into their responsibility, the last two episodes. Comics fans would be prepared for the "invincible war" bow in which A reviving Angstrom tax (Sterling K. Brown) It attacks the country with a team of malicious disrespects from all over the multiversum. But if you didn't know they were coming, the destruction of the Levi attack and the subsequent appearance of Wiltrumit Warrior's conquest (Effeefrey Dean Morgan) probably threw the wind out of you.

It is a brutal final, and because of the unprecedented destruction and the death number seen on the earth and for the emotional impact on the characters. However, despite his impressive spectacle, the "invincible" always allows the characters to lead the action. However, more often than not too late, MCU has been doing otherwise, which is part of why Disney franchise has been fighting in recent years.

Although the "invincible" is full of funny characters, bright costumes and scientific ideas for science/fantasy, it succeeds because it always remains grounded in the emotional life of his characters. Omni-Man (FC Simmons) is attracted to the conflict in it, which drives a ton of the biggest story. The same is true of Mark's growth and development as a hero, brother and boy-only in season 3. It is appropriate in one season when Mark is constantly faced with his own relationship with violence, he ends up fighting hyper-violent versions of himself. The invincible war is just as much thematic as the culmination of action, which is why it has hit so hard.

The same is true of conquest - the villain so indicative of a greater threat than Wiltrumit that he has no real name. Conquering is all that is afraid of Mark: a destructive force so powerful that there is nothing that it can do to save those he loves. In the end, the lesson is that he doesn't have to do all that himself. Eve revives and eventually delivers the impact that weakens the conquest to the point of defeat.

Think now The last few years of Marvel Studios stories. Anthony Soft is a great actor, but "Captain America: The brave new world" falls flat because it gives him very little material. The franchise progressed during the infinity saga because characters like Tony Stark (Robert Downey Runior) had consistent, long -term arcs around which major conflicts were spun. Seeing Tony as he goes from a selfish Playboy to his ultimate victim was the heart of those early stages of MCU. That's the same reason that the films "The Guardians of the Galaxy" were so successful and why people love Loki. But which characters now drive something in the bigger MCU story?

It's not just about individual arcs. The characters exist about each other - something that "invincible" understands very well. Season 3 contains more romantic arcs, venues and other complicated relationships. During a time Memorial -the service for Rex (Asonejson Manzukas) At the end of the "invincible" season 3, more accompanying characters are preparing to talk, and they all have different feelings for his death because we have seen our own unique relationships with him.

By comparison, one of the falls of Marvel's Scatterch's Scatterh is that he holds the characters separated from each other. This was especially true in the Disney+era. It is too expensive and difficult from the point of view to get more basic characters on the screen together for more than a few scenes a year. Older films "Avengers" worked because they provided that context for linking links, but we didn't have one of the endgame.

Obviously, the "invincible" benefits being the only TV show, not a mass franchise. It is stricter, cleaner and animation facilitates the maintenance of a large list of talent talents. That said, I can't help, but I feel like this series have more characters that I care about than MCC in full at this point. Especially the "invincible" season 3 does a fantastic job of giving a significant, attractive material to most of the accompanying team, from reducing Rae (Gray Griffin) to Titan (Todd Williams). You don't need three films and two streaming opportunities to get viewers to take care of someone, you just need deliberate writing - something MCC has not had in recent years.

It is impressive how different threads of the story "invincible" are active at all times. Of course, not everyone can be present in every episode, but it's a master class in balancing and payments. Every story in the show feels like it is on its own timer, and those timers are arranged perfectly, so as it turns off, three more hit key moments on their own. Just look at the final editing of the "invincible" season 3, which carries several sleeping strands, while showing various characters that end seasonal arcs.

In the early MCU, even in the franchise film that did not allow smooth storytelling on television, Marvel Studios did a decent job of doing the same thing. The overlap of the different sub-franchises, larger villains such as hydra and Thanos, and the building of the team's dynamics, developed in synchronization with each other. It wasn't very high art, but it was enough when "Infinity War and Endgame" came out, directors Anthony and Oeo Rousseau had a deep emotional bag to earn with fans.

The current model of Marvel Studios seems to be more interested in keeping the different characters and series separate, which is not necessary bad. However, the home of ideas fought to balance that division with mass budgets and the goals of "viewing events" from the past. If you do not want everyone to have to see everything, then you cannot expect an audience of "avengers". With DC Studios to start its new era, Marvel may have a reduction in the window to understand things.

The "invincible" is a streaming of the premiere video.