The couple filed a request for maintaining their texts with a "high profile" to people confidential, stating the concern that Baldoni's camp can leak on the press.

However, lawyer Justin Baldonija Bryan Freedman hit Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, inviting his suggestion "unnecessary".

Lively and Reynolds want their talks to be kept private as their current battle of the court from Baldoni salaries.

At the hearing in the Federal Court, Menhattan said a couple wants to set a protective order to ask a "high profile" people about lively time ", as they fear Baldons can leak them to the press, by Rolling stone.

In court, the lawyer explained that such texts would have a high "PR value" whether they are relevant to the fact of the case.

"There is a significant chance for incorrigible damage if marginal conversations with high individuals without relevance in case they fall into the wrong hands," said the levisy.

"There are 100 million reasons for these parties to study information because the PR value is higher than complying with the court's order," the lawyer added.

According to news data, the lawyer went to deny the Judge Lewis Liman to set up an additional layer of security, known as the category "Lawyers", and information on the mental health of the parties and security measures taken in the middle of Feed.

Gardenese emphasized that such a mark is placed on information that involve "speaking about children, deep mental health issues or the locations of private residences or houses."

When Liman asked the government if he implies that Baldoni's lawyers set up "risk" vibrant and Reynold's security, the lawyer said "No".

However, Government noted that Baldoni co-financed include people "whose life is based on providing information in printing and content crafts."

Baldonije's lawyer Bryan Freedman has ever hit a powerful pair by saying that it was "unnecessary" and "offensive to suggest that we would neglect the protective order".

Freedman added that the lively and Reynolds plan unfairly treated "celebrities" and "people who are in the industry" powerful in the industry "differently from others.

He also explained that the so-called "model" protective order submitted to the Court to deal with the leakage of sensitive information in the case already provides sufficient protection.

"My clients have the right to defend themselves, they have the right to transparency," he told the court, by New York PostAdding that the proposed setting is not intended for the vibrant "abuse".

Judge Liman did not immediately pass his judgment, saying he would soon give his view. "However, he warned that he collected the public interest", there is a premise of public access "in federal collisions.

Liman added that the existing proposed protective order conditions would already fail from the leakage of sensitive data on the press, adding that any such landslides could be held in the contempt of the court, thus risking in a row or even prison.

This comes after Liman suggested on Tuesday that he could dismiss New York Times As a defendant in the Baldonian anti-liveled lawsuit.

The star "Jane The Bogice" denies the states of sexual harassment with whom the film "Trassip Girl" banged him and submitted from 250 million defamatory defamation against her and news, who published her allegations.

After that he followed with a compensation of $ 400 million against lively, Reynolds and their journalists, Leslie Sloane, accusing them for conspiracies to destroy his reputation and Croatian control over him.

However, Judge Liman said New York Times' 28. February that is justified from the case that offered "significant reasons for dismissal" and "strong that shows that its rejection proposal is likely to succeed."

The recent court in court comes after the lively subpoena sought access to more than two years of direct call and text data, JUDGE LIMAN rejected.

Lively sought "documents concerning negotiation and outgoing calls or text messages ... in the period from 1. December 2022. To date."

However, Liman ruled in Baldonija's favor, saying that the lively request could lead to the release of sensitive data related to doctors and psychologists and communications with people who are not connected to humans.

The judge also asked the offense reason for seeking calls and text data from two years before Baldoni allegedly 2024 started her.

"He mostly claims that court judges assistance will help the" greater network of individuals "estimated the negative media campaign against her," said Judge Liman, a Daily mail.

He continued, ", but according to the living appeal, this negative campaign did not start until approximately 2024. August ... therefore would be vaguely to communicate to the road in 2022. and 2023. Discovered individuals who participated in the campaign."