Why did Dennis Vilnev change the end of Duna: Part two

Adaptation of Frank Herbert's novel in 1965 "Duna" proved to be awkward since David Lynch gave his best shot in 1984. Despite the fact that Lynch's film gained its fans in the years, subsequent years, There are all things that are wrong with Duna in 1984, and in 1984, " And they didn't improve all this with the TV adaptations that woke up. Although the versions of the scientific canal (now Syfy) were not without their allure, as long as Denis Vilnev took over the epic of Herbert science, it really got the adaptation he deserved.

For the most part, Vilnev seemed to have seemed impossible by staying faithful to Herbert's original vision, where possible, somehow succeeding in bringing the film with his sharp scientific instincts and sensibility. That said, certain elements of "Duna" in 2021 and "Duna: Second: Part: Second" of 2024 moved away from the original novel in important ways. For example, Lady Esseca's films from Vilnev, played by Rebecca Ferguson, are pregnant in both films, while in the novel she gave birth to a daughter, Alia (played in "Duna: Part Two" by Anja Taylor-Hoy in Kimo during flash-forward). This led to another big difference between films and their original material: Great death "Dunone 2" differs from the bookBy Baron Vladimir Harconen (Stellan Scarsgard) was killed by the Paul Atrids screen (Timothe Shalamet), while in the novel, he was taken out of Alia himself.

In an interview with Inverse"Dunone" and "Duna: Part Two" co-writer Jonon Spaits explained the choice, saying, "We were a little leuers of that talking kid, as a deterrent in the middle of the film. This is difficult to make a movie. " Instead, Paul listens to his unborn sister talking all over the movie. But there was even more changes, with another significant redirection of the novel that came during that intense climax showing Baron Harconen fell from Paul Atrid instead of his sister.

DUNA: The second part has a small but significant change from the book

During "Duna: Part Two", we see that Paul Atreids is building a connection with Zendaya, Fremen, Janie. While he immersed himself in a freme culture and learns their combat tactics before his attack on Harconens, Paul Foles for Canie and, as was the case in the novel, the pair's Lovebow Story becomes a central story in the film.

The film also follows the book on the climate battle between Paul and Fade-Rauta Harconen (Austin Butler), with a pair of duel to death and half. However, before the battle happened, Paul said that if he beats Fade-Rauta, he will marry Princess Irulan (Florence Pug), the daughter of Emperor Jaddam IV (Christopher Wayken), shocking to all present-including Janie, who looks absolutely destroyed. In the book, however, Cani Standing on Paul after he decided to marry an illulin, a seemingly understanding of the political existence of such a move. However, at no time in Denis Vilnev's film it is clear that the marriage of Paul and Irulan is a political move, and both Canie and the audience remain to wonder why the hero turned his back on the woman with whom he spent his full time in Loveubov.

What was Vilnev's reasoning behind this small but significant change? In the eyes of the director, Canie's shock from Paul's apparent betrayal helped to highlight one of the key topics in the story "Duna".

Denis Vilnev's more "emotional" dune: Final in the second part

Although it may seem like a pretty little change from the book, after Paul suddenly seems to turn her back on "Duna: Part Two", it was followed that their Buysbow affair was a big moment at the end of the film. It suggested that Paul began to lose his way and may be spoiled by the opportunity to gain more power, though he would only beat Fade Rute and Baron. As such, it was a dramatic and shocking moment to witness him by disrespecting Hani and following Princess Irulan.

Talking to EmpireDennis Vilnev explained his judgment behind the change, saying:

"I think it's much more romantic. It's much more emotional. We can deal with it. He has to make a political move and it's a feudal world, so to get the power, he'll take Irulan's hand, but the way he expresses it in the film is much more romantic."

The French Canadian director also talked about how such a change brings one of the basic themes of the film in the forefront. During "Duna: Part Two", Canie appears worried about Paul's growing influence on Fremen, even while she is in it - just one of many Intense emotional battles for Janie Zendaya struggled to portray in "Duna". Although her concern seems to be unfounded for most of the film, this last switch seems to confirm that Paul's goals are not completely benign, and that Canie had the right to be concerned about the corrupt influence that Paul's ambitions were worried about using power from the king.

As Villneev put in an interview with his empire, "to see it, I think from Canie's point of view, she is destroyed by the fact that Paul goes to Irulan, but much more with the fact that he becomes a colonized figure, something he told him he would never do."



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *