New York Times Has formally filed a proposal to dismiss Justin $ 250 million suitThe

Accordingly TimeframeThe outlet filed a proposal in the New York Federal Court on Friday, February 26, protecting its report Blake Lively's Allegedly against Baldoni 40 years old It ends with us And asking Now To be removed from the case.

New York Times Arguing that in their report and newsgrading article "We can bury anyone: inside a Hollywood smiria machine", which detail Vigor Against Baldoni, was fair and accurate. In filing of Friday's Court, Now The accused Baldney and Weefer's studios are not involved in creating "unilateral" details of their dispute against the lively Now

"Wafer's party's FAC tells a one -sided story that has earned a lot of headlines," the Now Reading the courting of the court. “But Time This is not included in the dispute. "

In a statement Our weekly Friday, February 28, New York Times The step of the dismissal doubled.

“As our speed looks like, this case should never have been brought against New York Times"A spokesperson OursThe "Blake raised serious concerns over the way he was treated on Lively set and after the release of the movie. We did what we should do exactly what we should do: We have notified the public about the allegations he filed in the California civil rights department. Mr. Baldoni Time - To question our morality, to try to infant our report, to file a baseless case - not silent us. "

Baldoni was one of the 10 plaintiffs, it also includes preacher Melissa Nathan And Jennifer Abell As well as It ends with us Producer James Heath And Steve Saraotz, Who started legal activities against it New York Times 2024 on the eve of the new year.

The plaintiffs have sued for abusive and false light attacks of privacy and have complained that the publication has been excluded to distract readers in his article on "cherry-selling" communication and excluded readers to confuse readers, which was published on December 21. New York Times Their report was wrong or wrong in the speed of dismissing their report.

"The first revised complaint (" FAC ") of their 224-page (" FAC ") (Plus is a joint 168-page timeline) Waferer teams are actually actor Blake Lively (" Lively ") and Justin Baldoni (" Baldoni "), a moving Hollywood drama," Baldoni "). It ends with us“The court submitted on Friday read the filing.” FAC, however, has achieved its obvious motives; the story of Wafer's party has been reported by numerous news outlets in the past few weeks. What FAC did not do, however, applied for an effective claim against it TimeThe "

After the filing of the court, a spokesperson of 37 years old Lively said Our weekly Suit that that has agreed on behalf of them New York Times Should be excluded.

“At the speed of dismissal, the New York Times What is the issue of Justin Baldoni calls it correctly: a shameless PR document that has no business in the law court, “a lively representative said Our

The spokesperson added: “For years Baldoni called for men to listen and believe in women. But when a woman talked about her behavior, she and her billionaire supporters Steve Sorovits The world has used a social media war plan to 'bury' and 'burial' him and 'destroy' him, with those who have reported it to the media. These threat strategies will not survive in court and everyone will see what they are demanding for their qualifications. "

Our weekly Reached Baldoni's representatives for comments.

Baldoni's attorney in December after filing a $ 250 million suit Brian Friedman Promised to “get down” New York Times, To describe its report in a statement as a "wicked memory promotion" Our weekly.

"Blake Lively and his team are fully ordered by the promotions of this wicked memory, the New York Times Two strong 'untouchable' Hollywood's desire and intriguing, journalism practice and ethics, using doctors and manipulated texts and deliberately argue their selected PR stories, exclude texts, "he said a statement," he said Ours At that time, "In doing so, they prepare the results of their story and helped the promotion of their own devastating PR Smier and avoided it and were created to resist the organic foundation of criticism among the online public." The irony is rich. "

He also said: "But don't make any mistakes, because we all come together to get down NY Times Without allowing them to deceive the public, we will continue this campaign of authenticity by suing the people who are abusing their power to try and destroy my clients. Although their sides hug the partial truth, we embrace the whole truth - and have all the contacts to back it. When this first started, the public would decide as they did. "

Baldoni Lively also has strongly denied all claims, To sue him on January 16 With her husband, Ryan RenoldsAnd preaching Leslie sloin (Who has filed a proposal to remove himself from the case) is at $ 400 million.