There are many reasons why Harry Potter restarts right now in Max Acts Got a lot of skepticism so farBut it's great that the original movie adaptations were already so impressive. From 2001 to 2011, Warner Bros. missed an impressive Potter movie after another. Fans may complain about certain gaps in the source material here or there, but the films are still so consistent in quality and so iconic in its result and visual. Why try to process them so soon?

But even though the Harry Potter films were successful by most metrics, Not all have succeeded equally. Of the eight films, two of them never received any Oscar nominations: "Chamber of Secret" at the Academy Awards in 2003 and the 2008 Phoenix "Order".

The Potter films with the most Oscar nominations were "Death Sanctiens: Part 2" (Best Art Direction, Best Makeup and Best Visual Effects,) and "Wizard Stone" (best artistic direction and decoration, best suit design, best Music/original result). Behind them were "Prisoner of Askaban" (best visual effects, the best original result) and "Death Sanctuary: Part 1" (best artistic direction, best visual effects). Only getting an Oscar nom was "Gablet of Fire" and "Semi-Black Prince" (best cinematography).

For both strange movies outside, they can be comforted by how none of those Oscar nomes for other films have never resulted in victory. Is it better to be nominated for an Oscar and get lost, or not to be nominated and therefore never increase your hopes in the first place? As a defender "Order of the Phoenix", I would say it is best to be second.

The second film in the series "Chamber of Secrets" was the tricky intermediate child between the three main installments of the series. The "Wizard's Stone" introduced the viewers of this world of children's magic and whim, and "Prisoner of Askaban" proved that the series can gracefully deal with the tradition of the characters in adulthood. The "Chamber of Secrets" was caught in the middle. It was as simple as the first movie, but without any novelty to equalize over the strongest edges.

The first two Potter films also had an accident to compete against the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy. These films were an undisputed triumph in categories as the best makeup and hairstyle, the best design design and the best visual effects. "The Wizard's Stone" could compete with them because it was the film that introduced the world of viewers' magic, but the "Chamber of Secrets" (which did not innovate much of what the first film established).

As for why the fifth film, "Order of the Phoenix", was hacked? Of course, there is no official explanation, but it certainly did not help that 2007 were A. A strange good year for moviesAnd the competition for the Oscars was just as big as it would be. When it comes to the Best Visual Effect Award, which was the strongest category of the Potter franchise, the Phoenix order competed against the Golden Compass, "Pirates of the Caribbean: At the end of the world" and "Transformers. Even if he was nominated, there was no chance of winning any of them. Heavy break! Perhaps the adaptation of the "Order of the Phoenix" will be better luck in the Emmy, assuming that the Harry Potter TV can do so in season 5.