Blake Lively has made new moves to get "receipts" to help her prove Justin Baldoni He was allegedly initiated by the smear campaign against her.

It follows that the actress is submitted by quotes for sexual harassment against her "ends with us" Star / director last December.

Justin Baldoni denies the accusations, he also leaned against the opposites in Blake vibrant for defamation.

From the accusee of Justin Baldoni sexual harassment and encouraging a toxic work environment, Blake Lively legal battle continued to intensify, on both sides of the decision.

One of the claims of lively was that Baldoni orchestrate a campaign against her to ruin her reputation, to which Baldoni's lawyers returned to the answer to the acting act only to commit to the act of an actress is done just to make her suit for an actress.

Now, according to DeadlineHe wants to prove the allegation and Šaltla Baldoni's recent publishing his side by providing "receipts" from Cell Calleiers Claudflare, as well as from the Wallace, a crisis advisor to the launch of the "digital military" against the acting order.

Livestock lawyers, ESRA Hudson lawyers and Michael Gottlieb, confirmed that she sent subpoene to all three, which will force them to release the necessary telephone records relevant to the case.

Lively lawyers claimed that the launch of this Process Discovery, the actress could "expose people, tactics and methods that worked on" destruction "and" bury "their reputation and family in the past year."

They further pointed out that these "receipts" "are nowhere to be found on the website of Mr. Freedaman," Reference on Baldoni's lawyer, Bryan Freedman and the website in which the actor shared its side of the Feed.

In response, Baldoni's lawyer strangled to court judicial collisions as a "mass fishing expedition" that proves that the actress and her representative are "desperately asking for any factual bases for their fair false claims."

"They seek each individual calls, record records, and even information about real-time location in the past 2.5 years, regardless of the sender, recipient, or the subject matter," onwards, to be able to find anything her receivables.

Meanwhile, he already has some shocking text messages between Balardonian public relations teams, which he claims to prove that the actor orchestrated "multilayer plan" to destroy his reputation.

Toward Daily mailMessages that included her suit against Baldoni was sent after expressing concerns about the conditions on the set of his film "ended with us."

The actress claimed that the EUR was also discussed by the Strategy Document for Baldoni, who identified "several potential scenarios" film director should be prepared unless the public complaints ".

Although it was unclear how the messages were obtained, a member of her team later revealed that they were insured from the phone owned by Baldoni's former journalist, who allegedly grew with the actor for "bullying".

All living accusations were furiously rejected by Baldoni, which also submitted a slander of 400 million defamation against actress and a debrief of 250 million dollars against New York Times for the publication of her statement.

Recently changed its lawsuit against lively to include more requirements due to the irresistible amount of the new evidence that came to light, "Po Daily mail.

"This fresh evidence supports what we knew all together, that due to the purely team of reasons, her entire national team presented the reputation to complex charges and manipulation of non-chief communications," Baldoni's lawyer said in the statement.

Freedman also claimed that "Current Public Interest for This Range Case on Ironic Lighting" about how New York Times And lively and her representatives "initiated" and were "deeply involved in" attempted stemming and smearing "of Baldoni.

JUDGE LEWIS LIMAN, who chairs the legal battle between livestock and Baldoni, recently denied the request of the actress to put an order for Gag on the lawyers of his meeting.

The lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds asked for a protective order to prevent Baldoni's lawyer, Freedman, from the involvement of "irregular behavior", including the reportedly and retraliator media campaign "against them.

In his request, they claimed that Freedman "violated the judicial rules that stop the lawyer to present statements to the press that is irrelevant to the case and can prejudice the jury."

However, Judge Liman denied a request for a couple and instead he said that he would adopt the rule for lawyers known as Rule 3.6, which bars of both parties may affect external statements that may affect extracurrent statements.

"My expectations are parties in accordance with his ethical obligations. I do not expect this case to roll over in a satellite litigation over the lawyer's comments," Liman said, said Liman, Po Daily mail. "They both said a lot in the statements that give the public a lot of feasts."