Whatever you think about the idea of ​​no more movie stars, one thing that I think we can all agree is that they don't do anymore like the Jameses Stewart. One of the few Hollywood Starswells whose personality outside the screen lived until his pedigree on the screen, Stewart has so many great movie moments That it would be incredibly difficult to choose the definitive best list. Of course, we can cite our favorite roles of Stewart, moments and movies, but the actor has had such a valued, varied and fruitful career that the list of everyone will surely be incredibly different.

Whether you prefer an early career "AW, Shucks" Stewart or Complex, conflicting, late careers Stewart, the actor has essentially done something for everyone during his time in the spotlight, which, as it happens, covers World War II in which Stewart served as Stewart as a pilot and commander. From the celebrated romantic comedies to Alfred Hitchcock's celebrated films and some of the most critical burning Wests ever produced, Stewart showed a unique range that makes his best films narrowing.

In 2025, however, we have something Stuart has never seen as coming: rotten tomatoes. In conditions of constant increase in the media, RT has become a useful resource for those looking for a way to reduce Murk and decide what is actually worth looking at. But the review aggregator also provides us with an easy, though imperfect, way to deal with any given actor or directorial career, and in the Stewart case, it is interesting to see which of his films managed to finish the perfect result in a perfect result. - and even more interesting to see which of his films no Achieve that status.

The wounded tomatoes are not just to check if the new film is doing well enough with the tomatometer to be worth seeing. It also allows us to look at the individual's career and get closer to what can be considered their best job. In the case of John Connery, spoiled tomatoes would believe his best movie The forgotten adventure with Disney's fantasy "Darby O'Gil and little people" (hey, I told you the system is imperfect). But that doesn't mean the site is completely useless in this regard - she at least given The perfect result of Andrew Garfield's excellent thriller "Red Driving: 1974."

So, we came to the Jamesesheims Stewart, who, today he was alive, can stop himself in self-implementation when faced with such a thing as "raised tomatoes", especially if he looked at the ranking of his film's site and saw certain His films designated cartoons. However, for our purposes, it is interesting to see which of his projects has actually managed to get the elusive result of a 100% critic, as some of the films you can expect to be in this exclusive club that just missed.

Stewart has 11 films with a perfect, 100% result of a critic on the site, which is quite impressive in itself. I mean, Wounded tomatoes claim to have only two perfect films in the entire genre of scienceSo 11 for just one man? It is a real statistic of the movie starvet (either he or the whole RT ranking system is not so coherent, but I use). What did the cut? Surely "is it a wonderful life" or "the back window" there? What about "Vertigo" or "Mr -Smith goes to Washington?" No.

Jameses Stewart's "Perfect" films are "Vivid Lady", "River Bending", "The Man of Larami", "Far Earth", "Shendach", "Story of Philadelphia", "Winchester" 73, "" The Mortal Storm , "Rose Marie", "Anatomy of Murder" and "The Naked Incentive". A healthy mix of genres, to be sure, but there are some glittering flaws. So what's going on?

Here's something with these "perfect" tomatoes spoiled. Usually, the less reviews the movie is, the greater the chance of getting either flat 0% or a full 100% result. This is simply a by -product of how the site works. To obtain a full percentage, each review submitted to the site should be assessed as positive or negative. What happens when it is kind of middle? Still gets either a positive or negative label, with RT curators, the task of determining whether the film is, such as Web site Explains: "Mixed-positive or mixed-negative". In other words, "should a decision be made: is it fresh or is it spoiled?"

The final percentage result is an idea of ​​how many reviewers found the movie "Fresh" and how much they found "spoiled". So when you have only a few views and the film is kind of good, which guarantees 100% results, simply because of the lack of available views and the fact that curators are likely to mark the aforementioned reviews "mixed positive. "In the case of the Jameseims Stewart, he has a full 11 films with the" perfect "result, and I am afraid to say, some of them are not very widely considered. One of the The best films for civil war ever made"Shenandea", for example, has only six criticisms that support their 100% rating, and several others are in the range of 10 to 12.

This is typical of older films, which did not immediately face the anger on the Internet and its places to view their debut. In contrast, that is part of the reason why some of the actor's most popular films are not in 100% club, with "rear window" and his 98% based on a healthy 133 views. Also, "it's a wonderful life" earned 94% based on 98 views. But Stuart's 100 percent are not fully composed of films with single-digit view numbers. In fact, the beloved Roma-Com "The Story of Philadelphia" is particularly impressive, with a 100% result based on a significant 105 views. Now That is Fresh Bonafide Rating! Similarly, the 1959 "Anatomy of the Murder" has a full 53 views on its perfect result, while Winchester 73 claims that decent 32 views.

With all that he said, 11 "perfect" movies are still some achievements, but you see it, and there is no one in Hollywood history no longer deserves that Stewart.