Legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni He continues to warm, with the actress attorney, revealing her plans to submit a revised complaint with a fresh allegation against the actors.

The advocates of earned stars were in court on Monday for a previous trial session, during which they entered the heated exchange regarding the case and the need for a protective order.

While Blake Lively's request for GAG account against lawyer Baldoni rejected, the judge who chaired the case said he would adopt a rule to ensure that both lawyers are controlled by what they share.

Lively lawyer hinted his intentions to file a new appeal to the fresh allegation against Justin Baldoni.

During the 11th Session Court who did not require that both stars were attending, Michael Gottlieb, Michael Gottlieb denied that the star's "gossip" was intentionally pulled that she "in fact, you are in fact, to file an updated appeal with fresh allegations.

Toward Daily mailGottlieb told the Court to plan to add "and receivables and parties to the revised appeal, which will bring Valentine's Day.

The lively and Baldonija were drawn to the legal battle after submitting a lawsuit for sexual harassment against him, in which she accused him and enchant "coordinated effort to destroy the reputation."

Liquid and her husband Ryan Reynolds, he asked the judge to the case, Judge Lewis Liman, as Baldoni's lawyer Urgio allegedly allegedly seems to be allegedly made by false statements about their case.

They claimed that the Protection Order would prevent Baldoni's lawyer to deal with "irregular behavior", including going to "harassment and retesting media campaign" against them.

However, Judge Liman did not look like he failed and denied their request. Instead, he discovered that he would adopt a rule for lawyers known as Rule 3.6, which bars both parties to give the external statements that can affect the jury.

"My expectations are parties in accordance with their ethical obligations. I don't expect this case to be negotiated in a satellite litigation over the lawyer's comments," Liman said. "They both said a lot in the statements that give the public a lot of feasts."

Otherwise during the court session, Gottlieb criticized Freedman to make statements outside the court who allegedly attacked the living "character, integrity and truthfulness".

Baldoni seemingly scored what he would see as a legal victory after Judge Liman denied Livelyin's argument that sought to Bar Freedani from being a delay lawyer.

The actor has then shot the living in a live sexual harassment lawsuit with his $ 400 million counter-branch, where he accused her and Reynolds tried to abduct his power and influence.

Recent reports suggest that the Pair will be called to produce all forms of communication, including text and emails, about Baldonija and "ends with us".

Source with insider knowledge said Daily mail That Reynolds and lively, together with their publicity of Leslie Sloane, confronts the precipitate, which will see them ordered to provide hours of testimony and Quizko Baldonije's lawyers.

The lively attorney, Gottlieb, he tried to prevent her from released from lawyers to perform false deposition. However, according to News OutletJudge Liman rejected him, saying, "I don't think that will happen," as he mentioned that Gottlieb would not decide.

Many other people can withdraw into a lively and baldon legal war, as Gottlieb stated in court to seek a protective warrant for the protection of live and Reynold celebrities.

Although no name was mentioned, Baldoni previously cited Taylor Swift in a 400m dollar quarter against lively, claiming that she used Popstar to use it.

"We believe that there will be provisions in the protective order that will be appropriate in this case, given the nature of the allegations and the high nature of some individuals who will be involved," Gottlieb said.

"There is a significant number of highly profiled individuals on both sides," he added. "Specifically, addressing interest and third party needs will be very important in this case."

The judge agreed with him and said that he were also called the other parties ", you already have a lot of high-high profile." Baldoni's lawyer also stated that he would be ready to agree to the order.

Lively and Reynolds alleged in the letter that Baldoni still sets up the "recasing campaign" against the actress and that the case is treated "can have profound consequences."

Toward DeadlineThe lawyer for money was sought in an earlier written letter to the Judge to Liman, in which they doubled about the need for GAG orders.

. .

"The parties on the road try to draw a dangerous false equivalence that can have profound consequences not only for this case, but also for other women who are sexually harassed in the workplace," the letter continued.