"Star Trek" was not always on the most tired trips. "The original series", The best of the "track", It just lasted three seasons on the NBC before the net to Oscars due to the low rating. The fans were brazen, but maintained the flame to burn for a decade (and made two seasons on the "animated series"), and celebrated when director Robert Wizz returned the crew of the Arswed -Branded Company for Star Trek: The Motion Picture. But when the film failed to execute box office expectations to "Paramount Images" (making $ 83 million in the United States with a $ 44m budget), the franchise seemed to be on the rope again.

Fortunately, director Nicolas Meyer came together and corrected the HIPWARD with a reasonable budget "Star Trek: The Grate of Khan", which earned $ 79 million in the United States and set the franchise on a profitable course that made the "next generation" sustainable; Therefore, the franchise has spread to fascinating, thinking and entertaining ways. Probably, Star Trek has never been in better shape.

This is a good thing because, last week, Olatunde Osjanmi, directed by Craig Pins, shown with the feature film "Star Trek: Part 31" premiered by Paramount+, and, according to the vast majority of Trek critics and fans, made the franchise A. Heavy bad service. How bad did you go down? After reviewing the aggregator spoiled tomatoes, he stands shameful over everything boldly comes before.

A few years ago, the current "Star Trek" store Alex Kurzmann, in devising ways to build the popular "Star Trek: Discovery", considered building a series around Michel Johch Filipa Georgiu. "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" rejoiced as a spinoff series "Discovery", but there was a feeling that fans wanted more Georgiu. Thus, Kurzman is pushing forward to the Spinoff film (derived from the previously developed series), and so "Star Trek: Dece 31" went to the cameras.

/Film Jacecob Hall described "Star Trek: Part 31" As a consent "thieves' day"-a caper with an action aesthetically designed to introduce random, less unfaithful scientific fans in the area-if possible. However, for the most part, critics believe that the film is unacceptable beyond the boundaries of what should be "Star Trek". It is not about exploring space with a high mind, but instead, fun, independent, self -service. According to Rotten Tomates reviewers, this was not a winning formula.

Activated in cinema during the summer of 1989, directed by William Shatner "Star Trek V: The Final Frontier" was considered a low water mark for the franchise. I think the film has its fleeting attraction (Kirk, Spack and Bones Going into Camping), but the whole plot to make-the-Starvala-to-god is ultimate. It's bad. Since it is currently rating 23% fresh on "Rotot Tomatoes", most of my colleagues agree.

But it's no longer the worst "Star Trek" anything According to spoiled tomatoes. As for this publication, "Star Trek: Part 31" Sits Below "Star Trek V: Final Frontier" at 20% fresh. With this metrics, it is an absolute Nadir of Star Trek. With a new season of "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" on the road, I doubt someone will give this movie another thought, while we will always warm. The books "OK, OK, the order of your boat" from the "final limit". That's more than I can say about "Star Trek: Uprising".