The late William Friedkin There was a reputation for his wild, turn, aggressive personality on film sets. He was so blurred and temperamental that he earned the nickname "Hurricane Billy" by his associates. The stories of the set of his 1973 "exorcist" -the 1973 exorcist are often told, and many actors, photographers and writers discussed the things that happened from the camera while making that film. It seems that a friend of a friend in a chaotic environment and played loud audio cassettes of tribal shouting between downloads. Someone even claimed that Friedkin would occasionally release gaps in the air, making sure that everyone was a little popup. That kind of behavior will be considered too careless today, but on the loving days of the 1970s, it was considered a kinda metal.

Friedkin has made several horror films and thrillers in his career outside the "exorcist", which is still often considered one of the worst films of all time. He also directed the 1987 Serial Murder of the 1987 film, and the Mi-Nanos-E-Matrov-Oblast Flick "The Guardian" in 1990. In 2006 and 2011, he directed two adaptations of Tracy Lets with "Bug" with "Bug" And "Killer OEO", perhaps the two most disturbing films in his career.

In an interview for 2015 with ViceThe director claims that he had no special crisis for horror, only attracted to certain types of stories. Friedkin made actions of movies, sports film, soft courts drama in the courtroom and more crime films. No genre exists for which affinity has felt. However, he admitted that he was certainly more attracted to dark plays than light comedies; His only real comedy film was his debut in 1967 "Good times" with Sony and Cher.

In a deputy interview, Friedkin was asked especially about horror, and in discussing the genre, he admitted that he hates a significant haunted home classic: Stanley Kubrick's "glitter".

Friedkin felt that there are only three reasons that people go to the cinema: to laugh, cry and be scared. Friedkin was not capable of making films that created laughter, but he could occasionally make us cry and, more often than anything, make us afraid. Even Friedkin's non-Horean films are intense enough to keep the random audience on the edge, and when it comes to his direct horror films, he had a certain way of thinking about it. It seems that his approach did not rely on the overwhelming power of style ... something he hated for "glitter". He said:

"I think I'm back in no horror movies as much as high -intensity movies for characters who have a back against Wallid and there is no place to walk. But you know, the genre of horror film is a small brotherhood of real classics. "Shining. 'I'm not a fan of'Glitter ' in general. It is a kind of masturbation, I felt. I don't think it's scary, and I also found it ... a little vague. I don't know what *** was about! "

Stanley Kubrick can easily be accused of being cool and managed to that level of alienation. Many of his characters do not feel entirely human, and the slow, deliberate strolling of the director can be extremely for certain viewers. Friedkin was certainly not thrilled by Kubrick's style. It seemed like he liked ove, more strong storytelling - stories that got into madness and panic in a way that Kubrick would remain from the distance.

And Friedkin, after making the "exorcist", certainly has Any right of lambasta "shines", just as Steven King often makes. Both films are very different, of course, but both regularly appear on the top 10 lists, both greeted as among the worst of all time. In Friedkin's defense, I suppose it will take a lot to scare the boy who made the "exorcist".