Is he knowing the accompanying turnaround ahead of time to harm the film?


This is a Great Turn, and to be fair, "companion" has many more twists on the sleeve as the film goes on, and these twists are not broken by the trailer. And yet the question remains: why did people involved in the "companion" felt the need to discover that Iris is a robot before the film came out? "Companion" is produced by Zack Kreger, director behind the aforementioned "Barvarian". It was another movie with many twists, and the trailers managed to avoid giving them almost everyone. For example: The incident of encouraging that film reveals a woman named Tess (Georgina Campbell) that appears at Erbnb to reveal that she is already occupied by someone else, a man named Keith, a cushion of Count Orlock, Bill Scarsgard. Immediately, tension appears: Should Tess enter the house with this strange man? What if he is a danger to her? Spoiler Alert: Tess enters the house, and eventually we find out that the whale is extremely harmless. Unfortunately, there is a monstrous killer who lurks in the basement of the house and ends up destroying the whale's skull and took a Tess prisoner. But none of this is in the trailer for "Barbarian" and that shock helped make that movie even better. The "companion" trailer that reveals Iris is a Botubo-Bat is equal to the teaser of "Barbarian", revealing that Keith is innocent and gets the skull crushed in the first act of the film.

However, did the knowledge of the "companion" for Iris hurt the film? I guess it depends on the viewer. When my girlfriend found out that the trailer gave the robotic nature of Iris after the fact, she said she felt she would not enjoy the film so much if she had this knowledge. But I There were He saw the trailer, and you know what? Anyway, I ended up with a lubo "companion" (You can read my review right here). After all, here I am kind of separation in the middle. On the one hand, I think I would like the film even more if I didn't know the turnaround ahead of time. On the other hand, I think the film still works great even if you know the turnaround.

In fact, the knowledge of the twist actually adds fun to the early scenes of the film. In the initial scenes, the writer-director Drew Hancock missed some fun little clues to Iris. After the meeting-sighted retrospective, Iris is introduced to the passenger seat of Oshosh's car seemingly asleep. "Iris, wake up," says Oshosh, who looks at Iris. Now, if you didn't know the turnaround, you can read this scene in a way of fact: Iris was sleeping and heard how the voice of Oshos woke her up. Anyway, as soon as you know that Iris is the robot in Oshosh command, you realize that he was literally Bringing it over the Internet By giving giving an order. Later, Iris and Oshoshos are shown in bed together. Iris continues to ask Oshosh's questions, on which Oshoshs sounds annoyed, says, "Iris, goes to sleep." Again: If you don't know that Iris is a bot, you interpret this scene as being a little rude to your girlfriend. Anyway, to know what Iris is doing the scene to play differently: after Josh says "Iris, go to sleep", Iris stops talking - because Oshosht has literally Close it for the night. The next day, Oshoshe asks Iris what time is, and that ingredient gives the information as it reads the weather report. "It never ages," Oshosh says, laughing. We can Read this scene as if we are witnessing a playful joke between a couple. But if you know the turnaround, you realize that Oshosh is looking for the time in the way someone asks the same question about their Amazon Alexa device.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *