Justin BaldoniIts lawyer replied Blake LivelyRecent request for a gag order in this pair's ongoing legal drama.

According to a letter received Our weekly Friday, Jan 24, Baldoni's Attorney Kevin Fritz When the Lively team officially requested the judge to refuse the gag order. Fritz argued that Lively, 37, started "Media Feeding Insanity" and claimed that he supplied New York Times Including a copy of it His real complaint Which included his allegations against Baldoni, 41, and his studio, Waferer.

The letter states, "The results have been completely disastrous for Mr. Baldoni and other Wayfare parties, who have immediately become the subject of public contempt and disobedience." "In the meantime, the Wafer parties have been deported from the gentle society and have suffered a total loss of hundreds of millions of dollars due to the burning media campaign of Mrs. Lively."

Fritz claimed that the legal team of Lively was a "scare strategy", especially after Baldoni's team recently released the unseen footage It is over with us One of which is Baldoni and Lively conversation during the dance scene.

The letter also states, "The Lively Party's desire to force the Wafere parties against the universally made allegations is not the right basis for a gag order. "It's strategic gamemanship, and it is objectionable."

The decision will be discussed at a conference scheduled on February 12.

Ours Baldoni and Lively reached representatives for comments

At the beginning of this week, Brian FriedmanWho is an additional lawyer of Baldoni, The video has been released In an attempt to deny the direction of Livley's story.

Received footage Ours Tuesday, January 21, a statement began with a statement that "MS. Lively complained that Mr. Baldoni and Mrs. Lively were filming for a slow dance montage during a scene, Mr Baldoni was acting inappropriately. 23, 2023- The following videos are definitely designed to show the two characters in love with the opportunity to be close to the scene and the sequel. The picture was taken. "

The footage showed a scene that came up in both Lively and Baldoni cases. In the video, Lively and Baldoni were seen discussing the smell of his nose and his spray tan. (Baldoni claimed in his court document that Lively told him Nose. Lively, for his part, complains that Baldoni was not in character when he praised his smell.)

After the video was titled, the legal team of Lively responded to the clip, claiming that it was "daming" because it supported its reunion.

"The video shows Mr Baldoni repeatedly leaning towards Livley, trying to kiss her, kissing her forehead, rubbing her face and face on her neck, shaking her lips with her old finger, she is gonna tell her how good she smells she is. , And talk to him out of character, "Lively's legal team said in a statement Ours Tuesday

The next day, Ours Lively and her husband got a letter, Ryan RenoldsWas filed in court on Tuesday, Would like a protective order To prevent Friedman from "wronging" against the couple. The pair claims that Friedman is violating the court rules that prevent a lawyer from addressing the press that is not related to the case and can make a jury possible possible.

Lively and Baldoni's legal drama started last month when he Filed a case Against the manager claiming that he sexually harassed him and created an adverse work environment when set on the set It is over with us. Baldoni strongly denied the allegations. Later he sued New York Times Lively's claim against him is $ 250 million for the outlet report. Baldoni also sued Lively, Renolds and Livley's publisters, Leslie sloinAnd is Seeking $ 400 million In the midst